Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0222
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the complete circulation path for the addition. Connect the sidewalk from the southern addition to the sidewalk along N Arcadia Av. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: January 12, 2021 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not this resubmittal) on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0222 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Addition to Fire Station 7, City of Tucson. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. See receipt attached. RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 11/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/05/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/25/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The existing building sewer and water service to the fire station run under the proposed south addition. Verify that the pipe materials are listed for use under a building and that they will not be adversely affected by the building foundation. Reference: Sections 605.3 and 702.2, IPC 2018. |
| 11/30/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number and DP20-0222 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. |
| 12/29/2020 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: 4902 E Pima St – Fire Station #7 Addition Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0222 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 29, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06 as well as compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 28, 2021. 1. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. Provide names and email addresses. 2. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Demonstrate compliance with use-specific standard 4.9.13.F. which requires a minimum 5 ft screen wall to the south and east. It appears that portions of the site are enclosed with a chain link fence, which does not meet the requirements of a screen wall per UDC Article 7.6.5. It is possible to modify this requirement through a Design Development Option (DDO), which is an administrative process. The DDO request would be for a substitution of materials to include slatted chain link fencing and vegetation in lieu of a solid wall. Contact Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for more information. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a, b, c – Update general notes on sheet 1. Include existing storage building on east of property, which appears to be approximately 100 sq ft. Update notes on floor area for each building, Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage, and Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. 4. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 5. 2-06.4.8.B – Verify all existing easements are drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 6. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Include information for Pima St and Arcadia Av on site plan. 7. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces and parking areas, fully dimensioned. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Correct notes regarding calculations on the number of parking spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. Parking for this use is calculated at 1 space per 300 sq ft of gross floor area. Please note, gross floor area excludes vehicle use area. Based on rough calculations, it appears approximately 24 parking spaces are required. Please verify this calculation. If the required number of parking spaces cannot be provided on site, there are options in UDC Article 7.4.5. which may work, including an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) or Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) per UDC Article 7.4.10. Alternately, you may wish to proceed with a variance request from the Board of Adjustment. Assuming the site is only short 1 parking space, the easiest option may be to provide extra bike parking, per UDC Article 7.4.5.E.3. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify location of the two short term bicycle spaces which are required. 11. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Correct setbacks (lines and general notes) for Pima and Arcadia. As Pima is a Major Street and Route, developing area setbacks are applied to both streets as found in UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2. Setback from Pima is 21 ft or the building wall height (whichever is greater) as measured from the back of future curb. Setback from Arcadia is 21 ft or the building wall height (whichever is greater), as measured from the outside edge of adjacent travel lane. 12. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). Provide sq ft and height of existing storage building on east of property. 13. 2-06.4.9.R – For the additions and expansions on site, show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Provide details for sidewalk area and accessible route on west of new building. Sidewalk is required to Pima St. At least one of the two routes to the streets must meet ADA standards. 14. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 15. Add case number DP20-0222 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |