Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0215
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: January 5, 2021 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT - There's a new Filedrop link for your resubmittal: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not this resubmittal) on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." so it is routed to correct staff member for quicker processing. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0215 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Desert Survivors, new modular office. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 01/05/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (The TEP FACILITY MAP - and TEP review comments 10.27.20 - documents can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) WO#6329770 October 26, 2020 SUBJECT: Desert Survivors 1020 W Starr Pass, DP20-0215 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted October 23, 2020. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time, a pole is shown but overhead and underground electric cable not depicted. Transformer and services absent form plans.In order for TEP to approve the plan, our facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Cruz Vega, at (520) 349-9850 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 10/30/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | * Paved fire access road required to within 150' of all exterior portions of the structure. * A hydrant must be within 400' of any exterior portion of the structure. |
| 11/10/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | EGSD has no objections to DP20-0215 as relates to solid waste and disposal conditions. Approved. Let me know if you have any questions regarding this review. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
| 11/17/2020 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | 11/17/20 ADOT South Central District has no comments and/or concerns for this project; due to the development location and scope. It will pose no impact upon the state system. Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office), 520.307.5893 (cell) |
| 11/17/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 11/17/20 Desert Survivors, DP20-0215, 1st submittal, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 11/18/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/19/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | November 19, 2020 RE: DP20-0215 / SITE - Desert Survivors, new modular office/ 1st Submittal, Received October 23, 2020 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP20-0215, Desert Survivors; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 4.18 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of West Star Pass Boulevard and South Santa Cruz Lane. The property is zoned Residence Zone 1 (R-1), with the proposed development being a new modular office. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. Conditions of approval: 1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 11/19/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/19/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | 11/19/20 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040 |
| 11/24/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Page Break Add case number and DP20-0215 on each sheet. Note: 9.2.2. EXPANSION OF A NONCONFORMING USE A nonconforming use may be expanded within an existing or new structure or in land area subject to approval by the Zoning Examiner in accordance with Section 3.4.3, Zoning Examiner Special Exception Procedure, and provided such expansion complies with the following standards: A. The expansion is being undertaken within five years of the time the use became nonconforming; B. The expansion complies with the UDC standards. These standards include, but are not limited to, setbacks applicable to the use itself or for new construction, bicycle and motor vehicle parking standards, and landscaping and screening standards; C. The expansion is for the principal use or for a use that is accessory and incidental to the operation of the existing nonconforming use; D. The amount of expansion does not exceed 50% of the floor area of the existing building or land area devoted to the existing nonconforming use. Incremental expansions, cumulatively, shall not exceed the 50% provision; E. The expansion area adjoins the land area, within the same lot, which houses the nonconforming use; and, F. The expansion must comply with the development standards listed for the Land Use Class of the nonconforming use in the most restrictive zone in which the nonconforming use is permitted as of right. Additional comments may apply Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. |
| 12/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Reqs Change | (The SEE ATTACHED mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 12/02/20 As per the terms of the lease (LF026) the applicant/Leasee will need to submit a request to the Real Estate Administrator to obtain written consent. See attached. Terms to be finalized in a new lease amendment (4th). Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Department of Transportation & Mobility Main 520-791-4181 Direct 520-837-6784 |
| 12/14/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Desert Survivors Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0215 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 13, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 – Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0215, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – The project is located within the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay and must be reviewed by the RAN review section prior to approval of this DP. Contact Maria Gayosso, (520)837-6972 or Maria.Gayosso@tucsonaz.gov or Nicholas Ross (520)837-4029 or Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |