Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0209
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/23/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/17/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/24/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number and DP20-0209 on each sheet. Additional comments may apply Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. |
| 12/08/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Broadway & Campbell Restaurant Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0209 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 20, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0209, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise Zoning and Land Use Note 3 to include the Use Specific Standards as listed in UDC Table 4.8-4, Commercial Services Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: Food Service: Excluding Soup Kitchens. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of 5 parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Show the required 1’-0” setback from the south end of the proposed addition to the drive-through, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 2 sheet DP-4, Bike Parking A & B the “2.50’” & “4.00’” dimension should be from the edge of bike rack not the center, see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The Long-Term bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1.a.(1) No long-term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. As you are proposed 2,500 sq. ft you are not less than 2,500, Provide the applicable Long-Term bicycle parking. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a building street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed addition to the applicable point along Broadway Blvd., see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height of the commercial structure(s) within the footprint of the building(s). 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.G Sidewalks or crosswalks cannot cross any type of stacking areas for drive-through lanes. That said relocate the sidewalk and crosswalk shown near the southwest corner of the proposed addition. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: December 21, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT - There's a new Filedrop link for your resubmittal: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not this resubmittal) on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." so it is routed to correct staff member for quicker processing. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0209 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Broadway and Campbell Restaurant. Broadway Improvements Remediation. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 12/21/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | 1. Consider adjusting grades to direct runoff to Water Harvesting Basin 1 from the building or drivethrough lanes. |