Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0205
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (The TEP FACILITY MAP mentioned below - and the TEP Redline document - can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) October 26, 2020 SUBJECT: Tuc Conv Center, DP20-0205 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted October 16, 2020. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. Existing TEP facilities are not shown on the submitted plans and may be in conflict with improvements. Please indicate where TEP facilities are on the submitted plans so that conflicts may be determined. In order for TEP to approve the plan, our facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Cruz Vega, at (520) 349-9850 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 10/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 10/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 10/23/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | See landscape comments. |
| 11/06/2020 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT South Central District has no comments and/or concerns for this project; due to the development location and scope. It should pose no impact upon the state system. Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office) |
| 11/10/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | See landscape comments. |
| 11/10/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | EGSD has no objections to DP20-0205. There are no proposed improvements or changes related to sold waste collection and disposal. Current provisions will remain as noted. Let me know if you have any questions. Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
| 11/11/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | See landscape comments. |
| 11/11/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no comments or concerns regarding this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040 |
| 11/12/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | See landscape comments. |
| 11/13/2020 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: TCC Improvements, 260 S Church Av Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0205 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 13, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 4, 2021. 1. 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. Correction of the sheet index is required. Page/sheet numbers and the content description are correct, but the civil reference numbers are incorrect on sheets 10-24. Verify references to various sheets are also correct in keynotes and annotations throughout the plan set. 2. 2-06.4.3 – Provide assigned development package case number DP20-0205 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.6 – As the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. This information can be added to the reference site plan provided on sheet 1. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - Correct general note 1: "Existing zoning is PAD-5 (Development Area A, B and D)." 5. 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Correct general note 4 to include the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage, including all parcels of the site. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Correct general note 2 to include Parking as a proposed use of the property. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. Provide case numbers once design and historic review case numbers have been assigned and any other relevant information per this standard. 8. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Information is missing from sheet 3 on parcels 117-20-026A and 117-20-0270 on the north, east and west property lines. 9. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. Indicate status of Easements B and D on sheet 4, which are located directly through the proposed parking garage. Clarify whether these easements will be abandoned. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. Verify parking spaces illustrated on sheet 15 for Parking Lot B. There is a discrepancy between numbered parking spaces and the overall parking calculations on sheet 3. Provide numbers for parking spaces in Parking Garage Lot C on the interior parking plans (sheets 23-24) in order to verify provided parking. Also verify discrepancy in ADA Parking Space Calculation note on sheet 23, which lists 397 parking spaces, whereas sheet 3 lists 590 spaces in Parking Garage Lot C. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Provide detail for typical van accessible parking space on sheet 25. Additional comments on accessible parking spaces may be forthcoming based on corrections for comments 10 and 11. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Clarify where the short-term bicycle parking spaces are provided. Sheet 3 indicates 68 are provided on site. Upon review of the plan set a total of 42 are indicated on sheets 8, 16 and 17. It is noted 4 spaces are located adjacent to the hotel. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 13. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.). Granada Ave and Church Ave are both MS&Rs. Verify with the Department of Transportation and Mobility if future widening or improvements are planned. If so, indicate on site plan. 14. 2-06.4.9.L – Verify all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private on the plan set. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 15. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Indicate setback line on south side of property along Cushing St. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. The new sidewalk at western terminus of Parking Lot B (keynote 11) is dimensioned at 5.0, 5.6 and 5.7 ft. Per PAD-5 Section III.A.3.d. sidewalks are to be a minimum of 6 ft in width. 17. Please note, due to the complexity of this site and the plan set, additional comments may be forthcoming following resubmittal corrections or upon completion of design and historic review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/13/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | November 12, 2020 RE: DP20-0205 / Site/Grading/SWPPP - Tucson Convention Center improvements. Meeting rooms, parking garage, site improvements / 1st Submittal, Received October 15, 2020 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP20-0205, Tucson Convention Center improvements; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 2.73 acre site, located northeast of the intersection of West Cushing Street and West Granada Avenue. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 5 (PAD-5), with the proposed development to construct new meeting rooms, a parking garage, and various site improvements. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Senior Airport Planner |
| 11/16/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/17/2020 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | See landscape comments. |
| 11/18/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | See landscape comments. |
| 11/18/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | 11/17/20 Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well. Regards, Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Department of Transportation Main 520-791-4181 Direct 520-837-6784 |
| 11/20/2020 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number, DP20-0205 Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with PAD-5 document. Development and infrastructure will be constructed to TDOT, standards. Obtain approval for any landscaping within the ROWs along Church Ave or Cushing Street. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/24/2020 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 11/25/2020 - María Gayosso Please address the following: 1. On every sheet, please add the following case numbers: RNA-DRB-20-7 / HPZ-20-073 (T20SA00320). 2. Meeting room addition and parking garage must match the approved Design Package (T20SA00320), including access from ROW and landscape materials. 3. On Sheet C1.2, please provide the location of interpretative signage, as specified in the approved Design Package (T20SA00320). |
| 11/25/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Reqs Change | See landscape comments. |
| 11/25/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Reqs Change | (Also see this review/document in PRO for a clearer text: "TDOT Landscape Review, 12.10.20") DTM Landscape: 1. Add the following notes for planting in the ROW to the plan. City of Tucson Department of Transportation & Mobility Standard Notes for Planting in Right of Way It is the owner’s responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Unified Development Code Technical Standards Manual section 10. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5’ wide (minimum) by 7’ tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15’ high clear zone over the travel lane. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Department of Transportation & Mobility or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property (excluding water meter). Contractor to obtain a ROW permit prior to construction within the ROW. 2. Add the following notes for Irrigation in the ROW: City of Tucson, Department of Transportation Requirements for placement of Private Irrigation Facilities Roadway Crossings within the Public Rights-of-Way Private irrigation facilities roadway crossings will only be permitted in residential roadways and NOT permitted in arterial or collector roadways. Lateral lines under constant pressure shall not be permitted in the public rights-of-way. The HOA will register private irrigation facilities placed in the public rights-of-way with Arizona 811and become an Arizona 811 Blue Stake Inc. member. Minimize the number of roadway crossings. Sleeves must be in a recorded easement (easement width is dependent on what is needed for installation and/or repairs). To the extent possible, the easements should be created at the time of development/platting. Irrigation lines shall be placed in ductile iron sleeves. Sleeve should extend beyond the right-of-way (into private property), unless otherwise approved by TDOT. HDPE continuous line (no joints under the pavement) Irrigation lines shall have a minimum of thirty (30) inches of cover. Detectable marking tape shall be installed. David Marhefka da’-vid mär-hef’-ka Landscape Architect City of Tucson Department of Transportation and Mobility (o) 520-837-6618 (m) 520-403-5074 |
| 12/07/2020 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Approved | 12/07/20 I reviewed the plans for the TCC Landscaping. The revisions are consistent with HPZ review recommendations. Good to process with no historic concerns. Thanks Michael Taku, MS, Historic Design Review Coordinator Lead Planner City of Tucson Planning and Development Services 520.837.4963 www.tucsonaz.gov/historic-preservation |
| 12/16/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: December 17, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Online Payment 2. Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT - NEW FILEDROP for your resubmittal: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not this resubmittal) on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." so it is routed to correct staff member for quicker processing. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0205 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Tucson Convention Center improvements. Meeting rooms, parking garage, site improvements. FEES DUE: $ 5,460.94 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees IMPORTANT: If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back later after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay 6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info 7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |