Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0189
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/29/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/29/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 09/29/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 09/29/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 10/06/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section. Also see TEP UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS REDLINE.) WO#6327311 October 5 2020 SUBJECT: AJO MARKETPLACE, DP20-0189 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 7 2020. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Jeremy Erlacher New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-396-2898 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 991-5495 Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) Ajo Mktplace, DP20-0189, 1st submittal, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 10/26/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | * Future FDC location to be approved by AHJ |
| 10/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 10/27/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Ajo Marketplace Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0189 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 27, 2020 DUE DATE: October 27, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 28, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP20-0189, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – List the Use Specific Standards for “General Merchandise Sales” in the C-2 Zone in General Note 3, see UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – It does not appear that the parcel distance shown for Lots 4 & 5 match what is shown on final plat S20-031, clarify the differences. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G – Zoning acknowledges that Phasing is proposed with Phase 1 being the primary access lane. Phase 2 appears to be for lots 1, 2, 3 & 6 with lots 4 & 5 being developed under separate development packages. If lots 4 & 5 are being developed under separate development packages why do you show development on these lots on sheet 1 & 3 along with development standards, parking requirements, etc. on sheet 1? Also, clarify if what phase Lot 6 is part of. Based on the phase lines shown on the plan it not part of the access lanes shown under Phase 1 but within the footprint of the building on sheets 6 & 8 it shows Phase 1. Lot 6 also appears to show it to be improved under a separate development package, it is noted as “IMPROVEMENTS PER DP20-___” and development criteria, dimension and keynote have not been provided on sheet 5. Additional comments maybe forth coming once the phasing is clarified. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Until comment 4 has been addressed requirements of this standard cannot be fully addressed. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 1 General Note 18, Building #4 the square footage of the building is listed as 9,600, within the footprint on sheet 1 you show 9,200, which is correct. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Within the vehicle parking space calculation show the number of van accessible space required and provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clarify why parking details are being for areas that will be developed under separate DP’s 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 1 General Note 18, Building #1 Retail Sales the required ratio used for the short-term bicycle paring is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Retail Trade Uses Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA, Short-term bicycle parking is based on 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 11 show the required dimension from the rack to the building to the south, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – If lots 4 & 5 are under a separate development package why are you providing bicycle details for these lots? 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – You provide a bicycle parking detail for lots 6 but do not show the bicycle parking on sheet 5, clarify. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Building #3 it appears that the proposed short-term bicycle parking encroaches into the sidewalk width. Clearly shown that the minimum 4’ sidewalk is maintained. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Depending on when lot 6 will be developed demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3 are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/27/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0189 on each sheet. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/28/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | October 28, 2020 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP20-0189 PROJECT NAME: Ajo Market Place PROJECT ADDRESS: 2100 E Ajo PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola Transportation and Mobility Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development plan. 1. Offsite improvements according to the traffic impact analysis will require the extension of the left turn bay to the east driveway by 75 feet. Show on plan. This will require a private improvement plan (PIA) Include any signs or new striping for right turn/bus bay area in the PIA. 2. New pedestrian ramps are required for the east driveway according to pag standard details. Show new ramps and call out pag standard detail 207 type 2 directional ramp. Call out pag details for all new ramps. Type 1 for west driveway (west side of driveway) Type 2 on the east side of west driveway. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/29/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/05/2020 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 11/25/2020 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Bearings and distances for Lots 4&5 on pages 4, 5, & 9 are not matching the bearings and distances shown on page 10 or the final plat S20-031. Please check bearings and distances throughout the plan set and verify that they match what is shown on the final plat. 2. Please clarify what infrastructure, specifically detention/retention basins, a is being constructed in which phase and include a proposed phasing plan and the schedule of development of each phase as per Administrative Manual section 2-12.2.3.A. 3. Per Administrative Manual section 2-12.2.3.G - Demonstrate that each phase will be fully functional and independent at the time of completion of that phase. Stephen Blood stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/25/2020 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | 11/25/20 ADOT South Central District has no comments and/or concerns for this project; due to the development location. It will pose no direct impact upon the state system. Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office), 520.307.5893 (cell) RLaPierre@azdot.gov |
| 11/25/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: November 25, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT - NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" For all NEW submittals on the upload page, select the box: "Site Review..." so it is routed to correct staff member for quick processing. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0189 DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING - Ajo Marketplace. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents (NEW LINK for all uploads): https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |