Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP20-0187
Parcel: 12417029A

Address:
901 E 18TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP20-0187
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/21/2021 SAMUEL ROGERS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change DRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Samuel Rogers, Planner

PROJECT: Sprint Communication
Development Package (2nd Review), DP20-0187

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 21, 2021

DUE DATE: January 4, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 02, 2021.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

The following comments still need to be addressed:

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

8. 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 3 to “Proposed Land Use: Communication – Wireless Communication subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.13.Q and 4.9.4.I.2, .3, &.4.a or 4.b”
General note 2 references UDC Table 4.8.4, this table shows allowed uses in residential zones. This site is the in the I-1 zone, see UDC Table 4.8.7 for allowed uses in this zone.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The use of this site is Communication – Wireless Communication, this is in the Commercial Lan Use Group. The correct parking calculation is 1 space per 300 GFA, so this site is required to have 12 parking spaces.
The required number of bike parking spaces is 2-short term spaces and 2 long term spaces, update the bake calculation accordingly. The site was previously nonconforming and an expansion of 25% is not proposed, so full code compliance is not required. The parking calc needs to be updated, but no bake space need to be installed or added to the plan.


17. 2-06.4.9.O – The perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 5 are not correct. As both Park and 18th are listed on the COT Major Streets and Routes plan and the ADT is 1000 or greater the required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two, measured from the back of future or existing curb, whichever is more restrictive. For the east property line perimeter yard setback, per UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES, I-1 Zone, Non Residential use to a Residential Zone the perimeter yard setback is 1 ½ times the height of the building exterior wall, for the north property line perimeter yard setback, per UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES, I-1 Zone, Non Residential use to a Non Residential Zone the perimeter yard setback is 0’-0”.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at samuel.rogers@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
01/22/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: January 22, 2021
Returned for Corrections / Request for Resubmittal

PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0187

DESCRIPTION: SITE - Sprint Communication, new shade structure/awning.

FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.

RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS
Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP:
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application", then the permit number

1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Title the documents for your 3rd submittal starting with the
submittal number, for example: 3_Plan_Set

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on View to the right of each document

FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not resubmittals) on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...".

Thank you.

City of Tucson
Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
12/03/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed