Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0173
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/28/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | * On CVR.1 under "Separate Permits" that the underground fire line requires a separate permit as well. * Unable to verify existing hydrant locations. * IFC requires hydrant located within 600' of all exterior of building; including a hydrant within 100' of the FDC. See Appendix B and C - 2018 IFC for requirements. * FYI, Emergency rescue openings (man doors) will be requied every 125' of building exterior at high pile storage areas. * Fire aerial access complying with Appendix D105 required on both the east and west sides of the building. |
| 10/05/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0173 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/07/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building. 2. Clarify the cleanout locations for the building sewer. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet measured from the cleanout rim, along the developed pipe length to the next drainage fitting providing access for cleaning. Reference Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018. |
| 10/08/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: TAC2 – New Shell Building Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2020 DUE DATE: October 6, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 14, 2021. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT 2-06.4.3 – Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0173, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT 2-06.4.4.A – The location map appears to be incorrect. Based on the address provided on the application the site should be located at the SWC of Country Club and Medina not Alvernon near Elvira. 3. COMMENT 2-06.4.4.B – Show Country Club & Medina on the location map and label. 4. COMMENT 2-06.4.4.C – The section corners for Valencia and Country Club should be labeled on the map as 8, 9,16 & 17. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT 2-06.4.8.A – Cleary show the site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds on the plan. Based on the parcel numbers provided on the application the west property line for parcel 140-42-065B should be shown as 399.52’ not 631.50 as shown on sheet 2, clarify what parcels and included in this project. 7. COMMENT 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable show all existing easements on the plan along with the recordation information on the plan. 8. COMMENT 2-06.4.8.C – Show the future right-of-way (ROW) for both Country Club and Elvira. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.E – A lot combination is required for this project. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 10. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 11. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.G – The plans reference phasing but no information is provided for the area around Building “B”. Clarify if you are going to Phase this plan or if Building “B” is just future. If Building “B” is just future and you are not going to provide information on the plans remove all references to Building “B” from the plan. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 12. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 13. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of van accessible spaces is not correct. Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11, section 1106.5 two (2) van accessible spaces are required. Also clarify what “ADA WCHAIR” is as it is not referenced in the 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. 14. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space. 15. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. See comment 11 above. 16. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.J – Show the future ROW line on the plan for Country Club and Elvira along with the future sidewalk, and curb. This site needs to be developed to meet the future ROW or provide a future ROW site plan that demonstrates how the site will meet code once the ROW is taken. 17. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.L – If applicable show all proposed easements on the plan and provide the recordation information. 18. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.O – GENERAL NOTE 12 the PROVIDED setbacks listed for the east is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2. and Figure 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or great this setback is measured from back of curb future curb location. 19. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.O – GENERAL NOTE 12 the PROVIDED setbacks listed for the north & south are not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2. and Figure 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000 this setback is measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 20. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.O – GENERAL NOTE 12 the REQUIRED setback listed for the west is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES, I-1 zone, Nonresidential Use to a Nonresidential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 0’-0”. 21. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height and use of each industrial structure within the footprint of the building(s). 22. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene (See Figure 2). That said a sidewalk is required along the north and south ends of the building. 23. COMMENT 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet. That said the required sidewalks for the north and south end of the building either need to be 6’-6” wide or wheel stops must be provided for the vehicle parking spaces to prevent parking vehicles from encroaching into the minimum 4’-0” sidewalk. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/27/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Oct. 27, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of your updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Tucson Airport Center (TAC 2), new shell building. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0173 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 10/27/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP20-0173 1. The results of the Drainage Report are accepted. Please incorporate the PC-LID and PC-Route spreadsheets into the report when the plans are re-submitted. 2. Show maneuverability for the solid waste service vehicles or label the containers as roll-outs. 3. Revise the solid waste container enclosures to match the details in Technical Standard 8-01. (A TSMR will be required for alternative design. 4. Add a note that signs will be by separate permit. 5. Provide a barrier to prevent vehicles from driving into future development area. 6. Provide cross slopes and running slopes for pedestrian routes to demonstrate ADA compliance. |