Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0164
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Passed by Loren Makus, 08/20/20 during OK to Submit. |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP mentioned below and a TEP REVIEW document can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) August 24th, 2020 SUBJECT: One South Church Hotel, DP20-0164 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted August, 21, 2020 TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. TEP has facilites on the South and West side of 1 S. Church Ave. that are not depicted in the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Cruz Vega, at (520) 349-9850 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 08/21/2020 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT South Central District has no comments and/or concerns for this project; due to the development location. It will pose no impact upon the state system. Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office) |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/25/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/26/2020 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | 8/26/2020 - Review by Maria Gayosso. Project is located in the Infill Incentive District - Rio Nuevo Area. Applicant has not filed an application RNA or IID for review. |
| 09/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | EGSD has no comments regarding One South Church Hotel, DP20-0164, 1st submittal There appears to be nothing proposed or relative to solid waste collection and disposal requirements. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson - Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
| 09/08/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/16/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040 |
| 09/21/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0164 on each sheet. The site is within the following Overlay District: Infill Incentive District DOWNTOWN CORE SUBDISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING A complete or partial exception to the landscaping and screening requirements in Section 7.6 may be granted by the PDSD Director, if shade along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths or outdoor patios is provided for pedestrians and customers in accordance Section 5.12.6.A.2. Alternative pedestrian access that creates connectivity between public entrances to the project and abutting sidewalk is allowed if no safety hazard is created. All pedestrian access must conform to the accessibility standards of the City's Building Code. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering and Design Professional comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/21/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP20-0164 September 21, 2020 Zelin Canchola Transportation and Mobility Engineering The plan requires chaange. Perk Tucson has provided comments concerning parking and loading zones. Please contact Prk Tucson for requirements. From Donovan Durband: I'm concerned about losing the freight loading zone for that block. The remaining office businesses in the tower would need a delivery zone, I'm sure, and so would the hotel. An option would be to co-locate the valet/ride-hailing zone with both the freight loading zone in its current location and the metered parking in its current location. The metered parking spaces could be designated for valet and passenger loading/unloading after 5pm and on weekends, and the freight loading could be time-limited to mornings, allowing that zone to be used for other deliveries and passenger loading/unloading the remainder of the time (afternoons, evenings, weekends). Donovan Durband, M.S., CAPP Administrator, Park Tucson City of Tucson Department of Transportation & Mobility Donovan.Durband@tucsonaz.gov www.ParkTucson.com Zelin Canchola zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/22/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Needs Review | Needs TDOT review. |
| 09/25/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: 1 South Church Hotel Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0164 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2020 DUE DATE: September 21, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 20, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0164, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile 3. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The proposed "HOTEL" use should be listed as "TRAVELERS ACCOMMODATION, LODGING". 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As this site is located within the down town core and the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) and you are proposing an exterior patio RNA & Historic review may be required. Contact Maria Gayosso, Maria.Gayosso@tucsonaz.gov for requirements and process. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If RNA or Historic review is required provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the floor area for the proposed patio on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage of the proposed patio within the footprint on the plan. 9. 2-06.4.9.W - All signage will require a separate review and permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/25/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: 1 South Church Hotel Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0164 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2020 DUE DATE: September 21, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 20, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0164, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile 3. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The proposed "HOTEL" use should be listed as "TRAVELERS ACCOMMODATION, LODGING". 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As this site is located within the down town core and the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) and you are proposing an exterior patio RNA & Historic review may be required. Contact Maria Gayosso, Maria.Gayosso@tucsonaz.gov for requirements and process. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If RNA or Historic review is required provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the floor area for the proposed patio on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage of the proposed patio within the footprint on the plan. 9. 2-06.4.9.W - All signage will require a separate review and permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | 10/01/20 Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well. Regards, Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Department of Transportation Main 520-791-4181, Direct 520-837-6784 Michael.Hollar@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Oct. 2, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of your updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. DESCRIPTION: SITE / IID - One South Church Hotel. Exterior improvements. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0164 FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS **Allow 1-2 days for correct amount to show** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay from checking account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay 6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info 7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |