Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/20/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Approved | 10/13/20 email The Fire Station No.9 project is granted permission to use the ROW for landscape, but must comply with all DTM requirements for planting in the ROW and all comments from Development Services need to be addressed prior to approval. You can find DTM requirements here: https://www.tucsonAz.gov/TDOT/Landscape It appears that some of the trees that are on the plan are on top of utilities. Please see the setbacks for utilities listed here: https://www.tucsonAz.gov/files/transportation/files/setbacks.pdf If the project intends to plant in the ROW, please include these updated notes for Planting in the ROW on the plan. David Marhefka, Landscape Architect City of Tucson Department of Transportation and Mobility (520) 837-6618, office (520) 403-5074, mobile |
| 11/20/2020 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNTIL APPROVED BY DTM, DAVID MARHEFKA LANDSCAPE CANNOT APPROVE. |
| 11/20/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Fire Station #9 Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0157 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 3, 2020 DUE DATE: September 4, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 06, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed, provide the case number on sheet 28. 2-06.4.3 – Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0157 and the administrative address, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. This includes the landscape sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. Zoning was not able to find a note that states the existing and proposed use please clarify where this not is at. 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing and proposed use should be listed as Protective Service (government owned and operated only). 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. Until the variance is approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. If approved provide the variance case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, R-1 Zone, Protective Service (P - government owned and operated only), the maximum lot coverage allowed is 60%, proposed is 79%. A Board of Adjustment for variance is required to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. The other option would be a City Manager Waiver. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. Zoning was not able to find the required 1’ setback, please specify what sheet this is shown on. 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) the proposed covered parking canopies must be setback 1’-0” from the PAAL. Show the required setback on the plan. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the radius dimension for the back-up-spur, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 and Figure 7.4.6-B. 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the back-up spur shown at the south end of the vehicle parking spaces shown on the east side of the building. 6. Until the variance is approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. If approved provide the variance case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the required number of vehicle parking space is not provided some type of modification is required. As a Board of Adjustment for variance or City Manager Waiver is required for lot coverage whatever process you elect to use can be use to reduce the number of required vehicle parking spaces. 7. Zoning acknowledges that this comment was addressed for short-term but there is nothing shown for long term. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly show the short – and long-term on the site plan and provide a detail for both that demonstrates how the requirements UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1 & .2, 7.4.9.C & .D are met. 8. Until the variance is approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. If approved provide the variance case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.R – – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.B a sidewalk is required between the building and the access lane. Provide a sidewalk along the north side of the large access lane off of Wilmot. 9. Until the variance is approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. If approved provide the variance case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.R - – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. Provide a sidewalk to Eastland. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/23/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Once the variance process is complete, ensure the plans are consistent with the approved variances. |
| 12/24/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: December 24, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT - There's a new Filedrop link for your resubmittal: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not this resubmittal) on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." so it is routed to correct staff member for quicker processing. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0157 DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - City of Tucson Fire Station No. 9. Redevelopment of existing station. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) See the attached payment receipt. Thank you! RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 3rd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 3_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |