Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0156
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/03/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/25/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. Remove any notes relating to how the site utilities are to be constructed. |
| 09/29/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL Identification and Descriptive Data The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0156 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/30/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | September 30, 2020 RE: DP20-0156 / SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Faisal Hangar, Tucson International Airport. Single slope building. 1840 E VALENCIA RD / 1st Submittal, Received September 1, 2020 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP20-0156, 1840 E Valencia Rd; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.35 acre site, located south of the intersection of East Valencia Road and South Campbell Avenue. The property is zoned Light Industrial Zone (I-1) and Mixed Use (MU), with the proposed development to construct a new aircraft hangar to store an aircraft. This site is within FAA traffic pattern airspace and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 10/02/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Faisal Hanger Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0156 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October DUE DATE: September 30, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 01, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 1. Comment 2-06.2.4 – Remove all references to building codes from the plans. 2-06.2.5 - Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. Comment 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the owner and provide the email address for the engineer and electrical consultant. 1. Comment 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2. Comment 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. Comment 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area. 5. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation appears to be incorrect. Based on a use of Transportation Service, Air Carrier the vehicle parking is based on 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA. The calculation shall include the number required and provided for accessible vehicle parking spaces. 6. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – An accessible parking space is required. 7. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The height dimension for the accessible parking sign is not correct and should be from the bottom of the van accessible sign. 8. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, 2 short term and 2 long term spaces are required. 9. Comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the short – and long – term bicycle parking spaces. 10. Comment 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of the hanger within the footprint of the building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/16/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a letter from the TIA hydrologist providing concurrence this project is consistent with the TIA master drainage report. 2. Provide the relevant notes from AM 2-06. 3. Show building area, height and roof drainage direction on the plans. |
| 10/22/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Oct. 22, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of your updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Faisal Hangar, Tucson International Airport. Single slope building. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0156 FEES DUE: $ 2,102.38 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS **Allow 1-2 days for correct amount to show** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay from checking account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay 6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info 7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |