Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0154
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 08/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/03/2020 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | 8/3/2020 - Review by Maria Gayosso. Applicant has not filed for an IID/HPZ review process. |
| 08/04/2020 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT South Central District has no comments and/or concerns for this project; due to the development location. It will pose no impact upon the state system. Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office) |
| 08/05/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 08/13/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP Facilities Map mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) August 12, 2020 SUBJECT: The Patio Bar DP20-0154 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 23, 2020. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Jeremy Erlacher, New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204), Tucson, AZ 85702 520-396-2898 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Cruz Vega at (520) 349-9850. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 08/17/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | 08/20/20 Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well. Regards, Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Department of Transportation Main 520-791-4181, Direct 520-837-6784 |
| 08/25/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/31/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: The Patio Bar Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0154 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2020 DUE DATE: August 31, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 02, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0154, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As it appears that some type of modification will be needed, i.e. IID, Board of Adjustment, etc. Provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the square footage for building, patio areas and if the garden area is a use area where food or beverage is served provide the garden square footage. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show sight visibility triangles on the plan. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide an access lane width dimension from the northeast corner of the eastern most parking space shown along the south property line to the vertical curb to the northeast. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It does not appear that vehicle parking space calculation is correct. The calculation should include all use areas include the patios, storage areas outside bar and if there will be food and beverage service in the garden area it should also be included. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 7 has been addressed and the total use area has been defined and provided the requirements for a loading space cannot be verified. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - It does not appear that short - & long-term bicycle parking space calculation is correct. The calculation should include all use areas include the patios, storage areas outside bar and if there will be food and beverage service in the garden area it should also be included. 10. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building 11. Revise Keynote 8 to include "GATES TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/31/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0154 on each sheet. The site is within the following overlay zone. DOWNTOWN LINKS SUBDISTRICT A complete or partial exception to the landscaping and screening requirements in Section 7.6 may be granted by the PDSD Director, if shade along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths or outdoor patios is provided for pedestrians and customers in accordance Section 5.12.6.A.2. Alternative pedestrian access that creates connectivity between public entrances to the project and abutting sidewalk is allowed if no safety hazard is created. All pedestrian access must conform to the accessibility standards of the City's Building Code. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering and Design Professional comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/31/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 09/01/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Reqs Change | Contact: David Marhefka Landscape ArchitectTRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY "David Marhefka" David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov For use of Public ROW |
| 09/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | EGSD comments to The Patio Bar, 1st submittal, DP20-0154, are as follows: 1. Depict 14' x 40' clear approach within drawing. TSM 8-01.5.3.B. 2. Depict turning radii's to, and backing from, enclosure. TSM 8-01.5.3.E 3. Identify back up distance from enclosure onto Prince Rd. TSM 8-01.5.3.F 4. Enclosure detail meets requirements. 5. Due to Prince Rd ending at Rillito Wash, the proposed design is acceptable. Feel free to contact me regarding these review comments. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson - Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 email: Andy.Vera@TucsonAz.gov |
| 09/17/2020 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP20-0154 1) Provide a trash enclosure detail and storage area per Technical standard section 8. Storage of containers must be onsite. Show access and maneuvering details 2) Detail 3 sheet 4. Note that minimum clearance from bottom of lowest sign to finished surface is 84" if the sign is located within a pedestrian circulation area. Update detail as needed 3) Show on plans that the pedestrian circulation path will have a maximum 2% cross slope 4) Sheet 3 Detail 2. Show cross slope and running slope of proposed accessible ramp 5) Show cross slope and running slope for sidewalk along 4th av. Out of compliance sidewalk will need to be replaced 6) Show on plans that any unused curb cuts or driveways will closed off and replaced with the necessary curb and sidewalk. Reference Tucson City code section 25-43. The existing curb cut along 4th av will need to be closed off 7) Ensure that roof drains, from existing building, scupper underneath sidewalks as needed. Reference COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.e. Show on plans roof drain locations. Sheet 2 of 5, shows roof drain discharge into pedestrian areas, this will need to be scuppered until it reaches the landscaped areas. Show discharge point for proposed landscapes areas and provide scuppers as needed 8) It is not clear how water enters and exits the proposed water harvesting tank 9) Provide top and bottom spot grades for proposed retaining walls 10) Proposed fill for new patios shows fill in excess of 2'. Reference TSM 2-01.8.0. written justification for the fill, permission from PDSD and notification of adjacent property owners will need to be obtained prior to plan approval 11) Provide spot grades in all depressed landscaped areas. Spot grades to take into account any proposed ground cover 12) Show curb cuts and spot grades to allow water to enter proposed water harvesting basins 13) Plans show obstructions within the Site Visibility Triangles along Herbert AV. Update as needed John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Sept. 21, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of your updated/corrected documents DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/ Floodplain / IID - The Patio Bar. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0154 FEES DUE: $ 692.57 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS **Allow 1-2 days for correct amount to show** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay from checking account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay 6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info 7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 09/21/2020 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Reqs Change | Historic review required if submitting for IID review. Please submit a Historic/IID application to start the process. Jodie Brown, AICP, Historic Preservation Officer City of Tucson 520.837.6968 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |