Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 2ND
Permit Number - DP20-0148
Review Name: REVISION - - 2ND
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/26/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/27/2021 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Approved | The project was reviewed by the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission Plans Review Subcommittee on 9/9/2021. It was approved as follows: It was moved by Commissioner Mulder to recommend approval with the following notes and clarifications, specifically: (1) five residential units will be added to the ground and lower levels, replacing potential office/retail lease space. Ground-level retail will remain along Broadway Boulevard. The number of residential units will change from 9 to 14; (2) regarding the east elevation, approve request to leave the existing terracotta façade as-is, [but] without any preapproval of future work (that is, if the applicant wishes to install a door or make other changes to that façade, they will have to come back [for further review]; (3) there will be no changes to the north elevation; (4) regarding the west elevation, the previously approved light well has been deleted [from the plans] and replaced with on-grade patios for ground-floor residential tenants, privacy fencing matches material and style of previously approved fencing, and doors will replace portions of the windows as shown on the elevation drawing dated 8-13-21; and (5) the west [public] patio area has been slightly increased in size, and one tree will be omitted due to the new fence location; elimination of this tree does not affect the sunshade study [as it is not in close proximity to the public sidewalk]. Commissioner Griffith seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by a roll call vote of 4-0. |
| 11/16/2021 | SAMUEL ROGERS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Completed |