Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0133
Parcel: 106070380

Address:
1010 W LIND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0133
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Step: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of documents

HOLIDAY: All City of Tucson offices (except for emergency services) will be closed on Friday, July 3.

DESCRIPTION: SITE - Jacobs Park YMCA, new shade structure on playground.
PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0133

FEES DUE: $ 264.00
Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees).
A payment is required before your next submittal.

ONLINE PAYMENTS
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd
NOTE: It may take 1-2 days for the full fee amount to show online.
Wait for full amount before paying.
Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay by checking account
1- Click blue tab: Pay Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click the blue tab: Continue
5- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO:
www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on blue icon to the right of each document

YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd

FOR FASTER PROCESSING, when on the Filedrop page, select the box
"Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all
DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions.
(For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".)

1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Approved by John Van Winkle on 06/29/20 (see Okay to Submit).
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change (Review comments are from Okay to Submit.)

CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields, Site Section Manager
PROJECT: Jacobs YMCA - Shade Structure
Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0132
TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 29, 2020
DUE DATE: OK to Submit
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.3.5 - Remove the DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE PDSD APPROVAL stamp from the plan as an electronic approval stamp will be applied to the plan.

2. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

a. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

b. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

c. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

3. 2-06.4.1 - Provide the name, email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site.

4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0133, adjacent to the title block in the lower right corner of the sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The existing and proposed use should be PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.13.B & C.

6. 2-06.4.9.O - The Perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan are not correct. Street perimeter yard setbacks, "SOUTH & EAST" are 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, great of the two. For Fairview the street perimeter yard is measured to the back of future curb. For Lind the street perimeter yard is measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. The north and west perimeter yard setback is 10' or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior building wall, great of the two.

Once the above comments are addressed and the plans have been resubmitted please send me an email so that I can provide and over-the-counter review.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/29/2020 SSHIELD1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed