Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0131
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | (Review comments from Okay to Submit, 06/25/20) 1. Show the existing property boundaries with dimensions and bearings. 2. Show how the proposed kiosk will affect drainage. 3. Show what is proposed for the parking space to be removed. Loren Makus Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov |
| 06/26/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields, Site Section Manager PROJECT: ATM for One AZ CU Development Package (1st Review), DP20-0131 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 25, 2020 DUE DATE: OK to Submit COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 26, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.5 - Remove the "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE PDSD APPROVAL" stamp from the plan as an electronic stamp will be applied once approved. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0131, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Also provide rezoning case number C9-74-24 in the same location. 3. 2-06.4.4.B - Label Santa Barbara Ave. and Paseo Dorado on the location map. 4. 2-06.4.4.C - Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot. Both parcels should be shown unless a lot combination is proposed. 7. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a vehicle parking calculation that includes the ratio used, based on UDC Table 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED. This calculation should show the number required and provided. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height. That said the vehicle parking space directly east of the proposed ATM will need to be 10'-0" wide. 11. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of the ATM within the footprint. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/30/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/01/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: Resubmittal of documents HOLIDAY: All City of Tucson offices (except for emergency services) will be closed on Friday, July 3. DESCRIPTION: SITE - One AZ Credit Union, new walk-up ATM PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0131 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on blue icon to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd FOR FASTER PROCESSING, when on the Filedrop page, select the box "Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions - and all Land Splits. (For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |