Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0129
Parcel: 117200270

Address:
180 S CHURCH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0129
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change (Review comments from OK to Submit, 06/24/20)

CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields, Site Section Manager
PROJECT: TCC Eckbo Plaze - Phase 1
Development Package (1st Review), DP20-0129
TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 24, 2020
DUE DATE: OK to Submit

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 34, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

1. 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP20-0129, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change (Review comments from OK to Submit, 06/26/20)

DP20-0129

1) Provide grading cut/fill quantities in cubic yards
2) Project proposes site disturbance of over 1 acre. Provide a complete SWPPP manual upon next submittal
3) Sheet L9.4 has a series of details which reference civil plan set details. Detail 5 indicates that stormwater may drain to Sewer. Stormwater may not be directed to the sewer system. Update details accordingly
4) Please provide a pre-post drainage boundary map showing where the current and proposed outlet points are
5) Provide invert elevations for all inlet/outlet locations for the below grade drainage system
6) Sheet L9.4. Please clarify the section view of the infiltrator system. Is there an outlet pipe at the bottom of the system? If the system is for retention/infiltration Confirm through infiltration testing that the basin drawdown time be less than 12 hrs. Reference COT Stormwater Detention/Retention manual, section 3.5
7) Show how the infiltrator system may be accessed for maintenance
8) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3
9) Provide spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas
10) Show on plans the cross slope and running slope of the proposed sidewalks to ensure that ADA requirements are being met
11) Please remove sheets E-001 through E-701. Commercial Electrical Review will need to occur under a seperate building permit

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
06/26/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
06/29/2020 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Passed This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing.

Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist

Pima County Development Services Department
(520) 724-9623
06/30/2020 GDAURIA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Completed
07/02/2020 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT South Central District has no formal comments/concerns for this development at this time.

Richard La Pierre
Permits Supervisor, South Central District
1221 South Second Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85713
520.388.4234 (office)
07/03/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approv-Cond Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements.

Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well.

Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent
Real Estate Division, Department of Transportation
Main 520-791-4181, Direct 520-837-6784
email: Michael.Hollar@TucsonAz.gov
07/17/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
07/23/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approved July 22, 2020

RE: DP20-0129 / SITE - Tucson Convention Center, Eckbo Plaza, Phase One, 1st submittal, Received June 26, 2020

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP20-0129, Tucson Convention Center, Eckbo Plaza, Phase One; 1st Submittal, a development package application for a site located southwest of the intersection of West Ochoa Street and South Church Avenue. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 5 (PAD-5), with the proposed development being landscaping and associated site improvements to restore an existing historic plaza
This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project and has no additional comments to provide.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner
07/24/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved The Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no comments or concerns with this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040
07/28/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide Case # DP20-0129 on each sheet.

Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the PAD document.

The following applies to site:

The Eckbo Plaza is a designated Historic Landmark

5.8.9. DESIGN STANDARDS

The HPZ Advisory Boards, Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission, staff, PDSD Director, and Mayor and Council shall be guided by the design standards in this section and the Technical Standards Manual when evaluating proposed development applications within the HPZ. Proposed development within the HPZ shall be in compliance with the following standards and the standards of the applicable HPZ as provided in Section 9-02.7.0, Specific Historic Preservation Zone Guidelines, the Technical Standards Manual.

A. Generally
1. Historic Landmark

Alterations or additions to a Historic Landmark shall properly preserve the historic and architectural characteristics that make it unique, and any changes or additions shall conform to the intrinsic and unique character of the building or structure itself. Any alterations to the interior of a publicly owned Historic Landmark shall be reviewed. The applicant should refer to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation when tax certification for rehabilitation work is contemplated.


Plan set will require additional reviews.

Ensure that Zoning, Engineering and any design review comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply
07/29/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
08/03/2020 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change 1. Showcase compliance with "Tucson Community Center PAD - Clarification Letter" at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/planned-area-development-similar-plans.
2. Provide decision letter (or staff email if not applicable) regarding RNA (i.e. DRB & TPCHC PRS).
3. Provide date of approval and activity number in general note.

Alexandra Hines
alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov
5208376975
08/03/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved I didn't identify anything related to solid waste collection and disposal impacts. I'm assuming they will remain the same. If propose changes then must comply with UDC/TSM section 8.
Thanks,
Andy Vera
City of Tucson - Environmental Services
Accounts Representative Supervisor
(520) 837-3798
08/04/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: Aug. 4, 2020

RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of documents

DESCRIPTION: SITE - Tucson Convention Center, Eckbo Plaza, Phase One.
PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0129

FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50
Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees).
A payment is required before your next submittal.

ONLINE PAYMENTS **Allow 1-2 days for correct amount to show** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
(Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay from checking account)
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click the blue tab: Continue
5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay
6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info
7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on View to the right of each document

YOUR NEXT STEP:
Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd
1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

FOR FASTER PROCESSING:
When on the Filedrop page, select the box
"Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all
DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions - and all Land Splits.
(For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".)

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/04/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed