Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0115
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/04/2020 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Fairview Greenhouse, 2nd submittal, DP20-0115, is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Dept (520) 724-7570 |
| 08/07/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | * Proposed materials for fire access road not approved. 2018 IFC 503.2.3 Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. TFD 2018 Amendment Section 503.2.3 Surface. Is hereby AMENDED by DELETING the words: "surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities" and REPLACING with the words: "paved with structural sections designed in accordance with City of Tucson Development Standards". Pervious concrete pavers may be accepted for a low use roadway. |
| 08/27/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Fairview Greenhouse Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0115 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2020 DUE DATE: August 27, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 01, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. As the parcel have been combined remove the parcels lines from the plans. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 107-07-003H, 107-07-003J, & 107-07-003K, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combination form with your next submittal. 2. This comment was not fully addressed, see additional comments below. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - As it appears that the proposed greenhouse addition exceeds a 25% building expansion, per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. That said provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area so that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4 can be verified. a. Provide a width dimension for the 7 entrances off of Fairview. b. Provide a width dimension for the 2 entrances off of Glenn. c. Sheet C2.2 provide a PAAL width for the eastern most PAAL running north/south. d. Sheet C2.2 provide a width dimension for the southern most access lane 3. The vehicle parking space calculations shows "MED MARIJUANA DISPENSARY PARKING", Clarify if the proposed use is a dispensary or cultivation site as a dispensary parks at 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gross floor area. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. As you are proposing two (2) primary uses on this site the vehicle parking should be based on the square footage utilized by each use and the applicable use as listed in UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED. The general manufacturing use is parked at 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA and the Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-Site Cultivation Location is parked at 1 space per 2,000 sq. ft. of storage area for the first 20,000 sq. ft. of storage area plus 1 space per 10,000 sq. ft. of storage area for over 20,000 sq. ft. of storage area, with a minimum of 2 spaces. The vehicle parking space calculation should list the ratio used for each use and the number of spaces required for each use and the total number provided on the site. The vehicle parking space calculation will also provide the number required and provided of accessible spaces. The current calculation only shows the required number of accessible spaces. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/28/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Sept. 2, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Fairview Greenhouse. MMJ cultivation facility PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0115 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 3rd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 3_Plan_Set On the Filedrop page, select the box: Site Review/CDRC... Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 09/02/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |