Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0115
Parcel: 10707003K

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0115
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/02/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/04/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide Case # DP20-0112 on each sheet.

7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

Street Landscape Borders

Located on Site

Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets.

Obtain permission for use of ROW

Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply
06/05/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/17/2020 GDAURIA1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change * A Fire access roads shall be provided to within 150' of all portions of the building.
* Those access roads must comply with Tucson Fire Code D103.
06/25/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide 5-year threshold retention in accordance with the retention/detention manual.
2. There are notes for protection of gas lines through the site. There are not gas line easements shown. Show the easements if applicable.
3. Note 17 on sheet one indicates a floodplain use permit is required. Delineate the effective floodplain boundaries or remove the note.
4. Add a note that where significant work is performed in existing landscape areas, the areas will be depressed for water harvesting.
5. Check all the notes for applicability.
06/30/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Step: Resubmittal of documents

HOLIDAY: All City of Tucson offices (except for emergency services) will be closed on Friday, July 3.

DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Fairview Greenhouse. MMJ cultivation facility.
PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0115
FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on blue icon to the right of each document

YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd

FOR FASTER PROCESSING, when on the Filedrop page, select the box
"Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all
DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions.
(For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".)

1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

Thank you.

Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
06/30/2020 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The attached plan mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section: "PimaCo Addressing review, Plan, 06.30.20")

Pima County Addressing is returning DP20-0115, Fairview Greenhouse (MMJ facility), 1st submittal, for corrections. Please see the attached plan for comments.

Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
(520) 724-9623
06/30/2020 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Site Section Manager

PROJECT: Fairview Greenhouse
Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0115

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 30, 2020

DUE DATE: June 30, 2020

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 01, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0115, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. 2-06.4.4.B - Label Glenn St on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The existing use should be a use listed in the UDC. Unless something has changed PSE primary use is General Manufacturing. The proposed uses should be listed as General Manufacturing Subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.5.C.2, .6, .7, & .8 and 4.9.13.Q and Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-Site Cultivation Location Subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.9.E.2 and 4.9.13.Q.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

4. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the square footage for each use.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove 'ZONING & LAND USE NOTE" 2 from the plan as lot coverage is not applicable in the I-1 zone.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

7. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 107-07-003H, 107-07-003J, & 107-07-003K, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combination form with your next submittal.

8. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning for the parcels north of Glenn and east of Fairview.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - As it appears that the proposed greenhouse addition exceeds a 25% building expansion, per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. That said provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area so that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4 can be verified.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said Sheet 8 the proposed access to the greenhouse is required to meet this standard, a concrete header does not comply.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. As you are proposing two (2) primary uses on this site the vehicle parking should be based on the square footage utilized by each use and the applicable use as listed in UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED. The general manufacturing use is parked at 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA and the Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-Site Cultivation Location is parked at 1 space per 2,000 sq. ft. of storage area for the first 20,000 sq. ft. of storage area plus 1 space per 10,000 sq. ft. of storage area for over 20,000 sq. ft. of storage area, with a minimum of 2 spaces. The vehicle parking space calculation should list the ratio used for each use and the number of spaces required for each use and the total number provided on the site. The vehicle parking space calculation will also provide the number required and provided of accessible spaces. The current calculation only shows the required number of accessible spaces.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 4 sheet 10 the wheel stop location dimension does not meet UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1.3.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly show all accessible vehicle parking spaces on the plan and that they comply with 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 4 is addressed loading space requirements cannot be verified.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 4 is addressed short- and long-term bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified. For your information Industrial uses do not require short-term bicycle parking but the Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-Site Cultivation Location does, see UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-Site Cultivation Location.

16. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height for all building, existing & proposed, within the footprint of the building(s).

17. 2-06.4.9.R - As it appears that the proposed greenhouse addition exceeds a 25% building expansion, per TSM Section 7-01.2.0.B.2 If the expansion is 25% or more, these provisions apply to the existing use or structure, as well as the expansion. That said per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A Provide a sidewalk from the existing building to Glenn St. and Fairview Ave. Also provide width dimensions for all existing sidewalks on site.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 8 "CONSTRUCTION NOTE" 5 states "CONC SWLK, WIDTH PER PLAN" but there are no widths provided on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/30/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed