Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0096
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/27/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Based on the location of the public sewer connection shown on your drawing, manhole 5628-03 is the downstream manhole; 5629-01 is the upstream manhole. The rim elevation of manhole 5629-01 appears to be roughly 2396’ which means that a backwater valve will be required. [Initial comment: Show the location of the connection to the public sewer and provide the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018 as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 05/03/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 246 W 22nd Street – Auto Repair Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0096 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 3, 2021 DUE DATE: May 5, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 02, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify all streets that abut the subject property 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Add the acreage to General Note 1. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly, the use specific standards for Automotive Major Service and Repair (excluding bodywork and paint-booths) is 4.9.13.E not 4.9.4.F.2, .3, .4, & .5 and for General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment the use specific standards is 4.9.9.B.1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide the USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS within General Note 3 for both the auto repair and retail use. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Zoning acknowledges that this comment should have been provided on the 1st review but per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 a back-up spur is required at the north end of the vehicle parking area. Provide a back-up spur that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 5. This comment was not addressed correctly. 7.4.9.B.1.e states “Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated”, demonstrate how the bicycle parking is illuminated at night. 7.4.9.B.2.f was not address show the required 2’ x 6’ spaces either on the plan or a detail. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term detail does not address UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e. & 7.4.9.B.2.f. 6. This comment was not addressed. Based on your response to this comment per UDC Article 6.4.5.B The width of the perimeter yard is the distance measured horizontally from a specified point to the face of each exterior building wall at the wall’s highest point, not an “AVERAGE” as stated in Site Note 16. The measurement is from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall provide this dimension. Also provide a setback dimension on the site plan from the north side of the building to the north property line, based on a wall height of 16’ the required perimeter yard setback to the north is 24”2-06.4.9.O – Provide building elevation with your next submittal so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/03/2021 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.2 Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements Plans set will include an irrigation plan: Irrigation Plan The following comments were not addressed: 1. Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site; 2. Source of irrigation water; 3. System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual); 4. Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods; Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Talavera Engineering Tue 5/11/2021 11:55 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0096 DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING - Auto repair building replacement. 246 W 22ND ST FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 3rd submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on “View” Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 05/11/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Show the 14' x 40' maneuvering area in front of the solid waste enclosure. Access would be improved if they enclosure is placed at an angle. |