Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP20-0077
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP20-0077 TENTATIVE PLAT / FLD - Corbett Village, an FLD subdivision. Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 08/05/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 08/13/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the 2nd submittal of the tentative plat submitted on July 30, 2020. An electrical construction drawing will be prepared with an Approved Tentative Plat. As previously identified, 10 foot by 10 foot easements will be required for all aboveground or underground pedestals and transformers. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the final plat in order for TEP to approve. If there are any questions, please contact me at 520-401-9895. Mary Burke, Senior Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Office - 520-917-8744, mburke@tep.com |
| 08/25/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/25/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/26/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Corbett Village, Lots 1 - 71, an FLT Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0077 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 26, 2020 DUE DATE: August 27, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 12, 2021. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 1. Provide documentation that the easements have been abandoned. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shown to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. Provide documentation that the dedication has been approved. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. It appears that the dedication requirements weren't addressed during the rezoning and will need to be addressed. 3. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the setback waiver request and the documents has been based onto the PDSD Direction for review. It this time no response has been received. 2-06.4.9.O - The "INTERIOR SETBACKS AS PERMITED BY THE BUILDING CODE" do not apply for the interior street perimeter yard setbacks. Demonstrate how you will meet one of the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b. 4. This comment was not correctly addressed. 29th is the only street where the perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future curb. All other streets are measured from the outside edge of nearest adjacent travel lane. 2-06.4.9.O - The "PERIMETER SETBACKS" are not correct. The street perimeter yard setback for 29th St should be listed as 21' or the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two, measured to the back of future curb. 5. 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a general note on the plan stating "ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARTE PERMIT". 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 6. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the setback waiver request and the documents has been based onto the PDSD Direction for review. It this time no response has been received. 2-06.5.3.A - Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.F.c are met. Also the sidewalk areas between buildings you show as functional open space do not count toward functional open space. 2-06.5.3.C - Provide a functional open space calculation that lists each area squared footage and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates that these areas meet the requirements of 8.7.3.F. 2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) 8. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and, If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: Sept. 3, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE PLAT / FLD - Corbett Village, an FLD subdivision. Lots 1-71, Common Area "A" (private streets), C.A. "B" (landscape, drainage), C.A. "C" (functional open space, landscape, drainage, public utilities). PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0077 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 3rd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 3_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the new Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 09/03/2020 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP20-0077 1) Previous comment 1. This comment was partially addressed. Per City of Tucson Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.8.I Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. Show on plans the 100 year floodplain boundaries for all regulatory areas with in 50' of all proposed work. This appears to include the outlet point of the proposed box culverts. Show on plans the floodplain boundary including water surface contours for Sahuara Av 2) Previous comment 2. For the lots proposed to drain in to the water harvesting basins, where the discharge would cross a sidewalk, a sidewalk scupper is needed. Lots 12,13,36,37 and 60 3) Previous comment 7. No TSMR has been found This project will require a pre-construction meeting prior to issuance of the development package permit. Project will require EOR certification prior to final inspection John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |