Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0071
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0071 on each sheet. Remove PDSD approval stamp. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/29/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/01/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Vantage West Credit Union - 801 E. Speedway Blvd. Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0071 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2020 DUE DATE: May 5, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 06, 2021. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.5 - Remove the "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE PDSD APPROVAL" stamp from the plans and provide a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an electronic approval stamp. This blank space should be in the same location on all sheets. 2. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. See requirements below, comments 5, 6, 7 & 8. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall be provided in the lower right corner of each sheet. 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0071, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 6. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 7. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 8. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 9. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove the lot coverage calculation from the plan as it is not applicable, see UDC TABLE 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1 51 to 75 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN PARKING FACILITIES, requires 3 accessible space with 1 being van accessible. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The wheel stop location dimension shown on Detail D004 sheet 4 is not correct, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A the minimum sidewalk width is 4'-0". Anywhere where vehicles are allowed to overhang a sidewalk the sidewalk must be 6'-6" wide or wheel stops must be provide to prevent vehicles from encroaching into the 4'-0" minimum sidewalk width. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/01/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING - Vantage West Credit Union, tenant improvement of existing facility. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0071 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) SEE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Reviews section, click on Review Details - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name your 2nd submittal documents to start with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set NOTE: The City of Tucson's Permit Counter at 201 N. Stone Avenue (the physical office) is closed to the public until further notice. In the meantime, our staff is working remotely from home. All communications are by telephone or email. CONTACT US Monday-Friday, 8:00 am to 12:00 noon https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/virtual-service-counter To request information or an over-the-counter review, sign in to the Virtual Service Counter and we will give you a call. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 05/01/2020 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP20-0071 1) Please reference City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 10-01.5.0 for dimensions and diagrams relating to Site Visibility Triangles 2) Show on plans that with a 2.5' vehicle overhang beyond the front of the proposed wheel stops that a minimum 4' wide pedestrian pathway is maintained. Update detail D0004 as needed 3) Per COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.7.B add the required hold harmless note and drainage will remain it is natural state note to the submitted plans 4) Engineering can conduct an expedited electronic review once that above comments have been address. Please email once confirmation has been received that the plans have been accepted for 2nd review John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |