Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0060
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/27/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/10/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Confirm the need for a 6" private sewer collection system. Connection of a 6" building sewer to the public sewer will require the installation of a manhole. |
| 04/15/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Dutch Bros- NWC of Fort Lowell & Campbell Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0060 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 15, 2020 DUE DATE: April 16, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 17, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Under General Note 3 you list "General Commercial" as a use but General Commercial is not a use in the UDC, clarify what this use is. Also clarify what use Use Specific Standard 4.9.9.B.3 is associated with. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 3. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements proposed to be released will need to be release prior to approval of the DP. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. 2-06.4.9.A - A lot combination will need to be completed prior to approval of the development package. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - There appears to be a typo under General Note 18 Parking Requirements. The total square footage shows 1,143 and based on what is shown within the footprint on other plans this should be 1,140. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As stated in comment ## General Commercial is not a use in the UDC, clarify what this use is so that the vehicle parking requirements can be verified. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - As stated in comment ## General Commercial is not a use in the UDC, clarify what this use is so that the short and long term bicycle parking requirements can be verified. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The long term bicycle parking calculation does not appear to be correct. Per UDC Article The number of short and long-term bicycle parking spaces required for each Land Use Group, Class and Type is listed in Table 7.4.8-1. Within the table Food service, Financial Service, Commercial Use Group all require a minimum 2 long term so the total should be 6 required. 9. 2-06.4.9.J - The future right-of-way (ROW) detail does not appear to be correct. Future ROW along Campbell is 120', your plan shows 130' with a ½ ROW of 75' which doesn't add up. Plus based on the future ROW plan the proposed development will not meet development standards if the road is widened. Zoning was not able to find a future site plan within the set that demonstrates how the site will meet code when the ROW is taken therefore a Board of Adjustment for Variance or a MS&R RIGHT-OF WAY USE MODIFICATION REQUEST must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this plan. 10. 2-06.4.9.L - The proposed access easement will need to be recorded prior to approval of the DP. 11. 2-06.4.9.O - Until comment ## is addressed street perimeter yard setbacks cannot be verified. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a A minimum perimeter yard is required between a building and an adjacent street as determined in Table 6.4.5.C-I, except setbacks for carports and garages in single-family and duplex development, which are determined in Section 6.4.5.C.2.b, Carports and Garages in Single-Family and Duplex Development. The setback is based on the projected street ADT. Of the two or more setback distances listed in Table 6.4.5.C-I for each ADT range, the building setback which provides the greatest distance from the street is required. (See Illustration 6.4.5-D.) 12. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk that meets the requirements of TSM Section 7-.1.4.2 & .3 out to the sidewalk within the Fort Lowell ROW. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/16/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/22/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide and label vertical separation between the vehicle use areas and the 4-foot sidewalk to the north of new building 1. 2. Since the modified concrete sidewalk, per detail E on sheet 6 can be from 0 inches to 6 inches above the pavement, label the height wherever the modified sidewalk is proposed. 3. Show the tree protection barriers for the parking lot tree locations. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/24/2020 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise each sheet of the Development Package to contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Add Case # DP20- 0060 Revise Landscape Plan (sheet 7 of 8) note #1 by replacing the LUC reference (Section #3.7.6) with City of Tucson Technical Standards Section 5-01.9 for current applicable Maintenance standards. On Landscape Plan (sheet 7 of 8) revise the tree symbol for Desert Willow (Chilopsis Linearis) to match the symbol used on the plan and to differentiate it from the key symbol used for Desert Museum Hybrid (Cercidium Hybrid). Clarify the discrepancy in the gross site area given on sheet 1 of the DP (shown to be 0.76 acres) and the total site area given on landscape plan sheet 7 (shown to be 0.69 acres). If this difference is due to accounting for the area with the existing building located in the southwest corner of the site, this should be made clear on the landscape plan. A lot combination of the 2 parcels will be required. Peter McLaughlin peter.mclaughlin@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-4898 |
| 05/04/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING - Dutch Bros, new coffee shop, Ft. Lowell/Campbell. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0060 FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50 A payment is required before we can accept your resubmittal. Please pay the total fees (or Review Fees at a minimum) Online Payment https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/online-resources-fees-maps-records 1. NOTE: It may take 1-2 days for complete information to be viewable 2. Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay by checking account 3. Not case-sensitive but a hyphen is needed, for example: dp19-2000 4. Enter Permit Nbr 5. Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 6. Click the Continue tab 7. If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Reviews section, click on Review Details - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name your 2nd submittal documents to start with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 05/04/2020 | TOM FISHER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Reqs Change | May 12, 2020 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP20-0060 PROJECT NAME: Dutch Bros PROJECT ADDRESS: 1855 E Ft Lowell Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola Transportation and Mobility Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development plan. 1. Show existing and future right of way on plan. The major routes and streets (MS&R) right of way shown on plan does not reflect the MS&R map. Future Campbell is 120 feet. Ft Lowell 100 feet. Show existing and future right of way. In addition show the right of way intersection widening requirement for widening at intersection, as shown on the MS&R chart. Campbell shall be shown as future equal to 150 feet, Ft Lowell 130 feet. 2. Show future right of way according to Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) as required for intersection widening. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |