Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0046
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/29/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/19/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: Steve Shields Site Section Manager Project: DP20-0046 (2nd Review MFR Parking Improvements 419 S 5th Av. TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 19, 2020 DUE DATE: June 11, 2020 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. 1. This comment was not addressed. Provide the use specific standard listed below adjacent to the use listed under "DEVELOPMENT DATA". COMMENT: The proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC is Multifamily Residential and is subject to use-specific standard 4.9.7.B.6. 2. COMMENT: Clearly show the require accessible vehicle parking space on the plan along with the required access aisle, see ICC A117.1, Section 502. 3. COMMENT: The vehicle parking space calculation is confusing. The plans show 3 spaces on site and the calc shows 2. The required shows 8 and provided shows 6. 4. The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling, minimum required for both Short- and Long-term is 2, the calc show 1. 5. COMMENT: Zoning cannot approval site until approval from HPZ and landscape reviewer. 6. COMMENT: The drawing index needs to include the landscape sheets. 7. COMMENT: The total number of sheets listed in the title block needs to include the landscape sheets. 8. The drawing set needs to be resubmitted as a single multi-page pdf including the landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Steve Shields by email Steve.Shield@tucsonaz.gov or phone (520)837-4956 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 06/25/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/ HPZ - Lee Residence. Parking lot, sidewalk, screen wall, gate. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0046 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on blue icon to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd FOR FASTER PROCESSING, when on the Filedrop page, select the box "Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions - and all Land Splits. (For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 3rd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 3_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 06/25/2020 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Reqs Change | To Applicant: Please submit for the Historic review on this work. The only work that has been reviewed and approved thus far is the demo of the ADU. Jodie Brown, AICP, Historic Preservation Officer City of Tucson email: Jodie.Brown@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |