Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP20-0008
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 01/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 01/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Applicant is responsible for obtaining a Water Availability Letter from Tucson Water (or Ray Water Company, if applicable). Provide the Letter in the next resubmittal. Mayor & Council cannot approve until water is assured. |
| 01/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 02/05/2020 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 02/05/2020 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Fort Glenn Homes (FLD Subdivision Lots 1 - 7 and CA's A, B, and C) Development Package (1st Review) 5001 E Glenn Street DP20-0008 - R-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2020 DUE DATE: February 12, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 9, 2021. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 - Assure that there is sufficient space for the PDSD approval stamp in the lower right corner of sheet 3. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 - On all sheets, label under the north arrow the drawing scale used. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0008, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - Remove all the black dots from the location map. Assure that the street names labeled within the location map are legible. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 - List next to the title block of all sheets the subdivision case number assigned to the final plat for this subdivision / development. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Clarify and / or revise general note 6 on the cover sheet. Is the 4,734 SF listed in the note the size of each building and is it living area or does it include the garage? 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Clarify general note 7: label the street as Private Street in the coverage calculation. (The calculation includes Parking, access, paved areas. Instead use driveway for residence parking, and Private Street and 90 degree parking area for the access or paved areas.) 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - If applicable, draw, label, and dimension all easements on the site. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Dimension the Glenn Street face of curb to the property line. Sidewalks along collector streets must be 6 feet wide. Revise the sidewalk along the Glenn Street frontage, see additional engineering comments. Label the recordation data for Glenn Street. I believe that all new sidewalks within a new subdivision must be a minimum of 5 feet wide, see engineering comments. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - In order to distinguish the lot lines from the building footprint or wall line work the lot shall be drawn to be a different thickness than the building footprint. There are several lot and common area lines that have not been labeled with the distance and bearings. Review the drawing and label any missing distance and bearings for lots and common areas. (It is suggested that a separate drawing of the lots and common areas with distance and bearings is included for clarity of the lot line and common area locations. The site sheet - 2 appears very busy with line work that is not distinguishable.) 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C - Clarify what is intended as open space as noted for Common area "A"? 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the east and south sides of the subject site. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.3 - The string of dimensions labeled at the entrance on sheet 3 are not legible or located correctly. Revise as required. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Approval of the street cross section as proposed will require approval through a TSMR. The required visitor parking area will also have to be approved as part of the TSMR. Contact Steve Shields for TSMR information. Label the proposed name for the private street. Label the street width dimensions and the dimension the visitor parking areas, overhang dimension and the back-up spur must be designed to comply with UDC Art 7.4.6.F.4 and figure 7.4.6-B. Revise the back-up spur as noted by the sections noted. A back up area is required when providing a gated community and adjacent to an MS&R street. See PDSD Engineering comments. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Add a general note for the interior building setbacks as follows. "Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots - The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City 's adopted Building Codes." The interior street setbacks have not been listed under general note 7. Use developing area setbacks based on the ADT of o to 140. See section 6.4.5.C. See the required setbacks for the Carport/Garage and the dwelling. Clearly delineate the dwelling building, garage and driveways in front of the garage or carport. Draw and label the Sight visibility triangles at the site entrance / Glenn Street. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a sidewalk connection the visitor parking space next to lot 5. The width of the interior sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet wide. See PDSD engineering comments. A pedestrian sidewalk along east side of Lot 7 is to be provided. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Add a note stating the type of refuse container to be provided, whether individual APC's for refuse and recycle or central refuse location. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Add a general note stating the type of mail service that will be used for this development, service to each unit or central gang mailbox location. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable detail the location of any proposed freestanding monument signage. If no signage is proposed add a general note that no signage is proposed for this development. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) Include as general notes, calculations, and detail drawings to demonstrate compliance with the FLD regulations. See the Design Professional comments related to the FLD requirements. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; 22. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 2-06.5.3 - Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 23. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A. - Demonstrate compliance with the required Building and Carport/Garage interior street setbacks. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 24. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.B - Add the following to General note 3; Proposed use is FLD using Development Alternative B. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C - It does not appear that the proposed FOS area meets the intent of the FOS requirements. The FOS is placed in the middle of a turnabout street with no specific use. The proposed FOS is unacceptable. Include in general note 10 the word "Functional" (Functional Open Space). 26. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D - Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits; 2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows: 27. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and, 28. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 - If available at time of next submittal of the DP, include a copy of the CC&R's, if not available the CC&R's shall be submitted with the Final Plat. 30. COMMENT: See the design professional comments related to FLD requirements. 31. COMMENT: Add the following to the end of general note 19; "City of Tucson Ordinance 104631" ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/06/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/07/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be required at time of development. |
| 02/12/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0008 on each sheet. 1. Residential Subdivisions Note: Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards. Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. 2. Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area. Obtain written permission for use of the ROW 3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual. 4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. 5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD. 6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: a. Tile; b. Stone; c. Brick; d. Adobe; e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or, f. Metal. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 02/12/2020 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (NOTE: See the attached TEP document viewable online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. "Documents" section - TEP Approval comments, 02.12.2020.) Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the Development Plan/Tentative Plat submitted on January 14, 2020. TEP approves the plat, however, please note that with the absence of the standard 10’ wide PUE along the front of the lots, TEP will require our standard 10’ wide by 10’ wide individual easements for each pedestal and transformer required to serve this subdivision. It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure there is sufficient room to accommodate TEP easements to be shown on the final plat. There is an existing electric service line to the property. Any relocation or removal of TEP facilities due to this project is billable to the developer. If there are any questions, please contact me at 520-9127-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke, Senior Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co., Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744, Cell - 520-401-9895 |
| 02/18/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the first floor elevation for the proposed residence on lot #2. 2. Label SMH #3 on the utility site plan. |
| 02/19/2020 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/20/2020 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP20-0008 1) Sheet 2. Keynote 28 is missing. Please update as needed 2) Sheet 2. Keynote 27 is pointing to a pedestrian bridge which is not detailed on the sheet. Please add an outline for the proposed pedestrian bridge or remove the keynote 3) The drainage report indicates that figure 2 is the existing onsite drainage map. Figure 2 appears to be the proposed drainage map. Please provide an existing onsite drainage map. 4) The proposed cul-de-sac detention/retention basin has a depth of over 2 feet. Provide a security barrier. Reference page 82 of the City of Tucson stormwater detention/retention manual 5) Provide a detail for the proposed bridge, including the required ADA compliant handrail with guard 6) Show how maintenance access to each basin will be provided. Each basin has a water depth of greater than 2' and a barrier is needed to prevent access. Provide a detail for a gate or feature that can be opened for maintenance and closed to prevent access. 7) The northeast basin proposes a retention depth of 1'. Provide infiltration testing showing that the basin draw-down time will be less than 12 hours 8) The drainage report indicates that certain landscaped areas will be depressed 6" to provide the remaining required retention volume. Outline these areas on the plans, showing the tributary area that is contributing to these landscaped areas. Provide spot grades in each area, which takes into account the depth of ground cover, to ensure that the required volume is being provided. Please note that required retention/detention facilities cannot be located on private property 9) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each proposed retention/detention basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control marker so it can be easily located in the future 10) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3 11) The back up spur for the eastern most parking space should be 3' deep with an additional 3' of clearance beyond the back of curb. Update as needed. Reference COT Unified Development Code (UDC) figure 7.4.6-B 12) Show on plans the radius of the curb return which connects the proposed subdivision to Glenn St. Reference TSM section 10-01.3.2.C 13) Sheet 3. A 2.5% cross slope is shown between the two proposed curb access ramps along Glenn St. The maximum cross slope is 2%. Please update plans as needed to show that the maximum accessible cross slope is not exceeded 14) This project will require a pre-construction meeting prior to issuance of the development package permit. Project will require EOR certification prior to final inspection John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/21/2020 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide architectural variation per UDC 8.7.3.M.1 since single-family detached units are abutting a collector (Glenn) street. For UDC 8.7.3.M.2, transition edge treatment and privacy mitigation do not apply to dettached single story residences. Alexandra Hines alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov 8376975 |
| 02/24/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review | |
| 02/24/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal with a Comment Response Letter DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat / FLD - Fort Glenn Homes, lots 1-7. Private street "A" (ingress, egress, open space, public utility), CA "B" (detention basin), CA "C" (landsc buffer). PERMIT: DP20-0008 For faster service, please enter this number in the Filedrop's "Project Description" field and on correspondence. FEES DUE: $ 3,352.06 Note: A payment is required before we can accept your resubmittal. PAYMENT OPTIONS Please pay the total fees (or Review Fees at a minimum): 1. Online Payment 2. In person at the City Permit Counter (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM) 3. By mail - a check payable to the City of Tucson (address is below), include the Activity Number Online Payment https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/online-resources-fees-maps-records 1. NOTE: It may take 1-2 days for complete permit information to be available online 2. Visa, MC, Discover, American Express 3. Not case-sensitive but a hyphen is needed, for example: dp19-2000 4. Enter your Permit Nbr. and click the Continue tab 5. Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 6. If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on Review Details YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Filedrop: In the Project Description field, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Name your 2nd submittal documents to start with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/24/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |