Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP20-0007
Parcel: 141020230

Address:
9801 E DREXEL RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP20-0007
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/14/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
01/14/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
01/14/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
01/14/2020 SBEASLE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed .
01/14/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
02/05/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Reqs Change Contact Howard Dutt at the Tucson Parks and Recreation Department to arrange a meeting regarding the "Trail System (Pedestrian)" shown on Sheet 2 of the Development package.
Items to be discussed will include:•
Any construction in the Fantasy Island Trails Park will require a 'Development and Use Agreement' to stipulate requirements regarding construction standards, maintenance responsibilities, insurance requirements, etc. •
What is the surfacing material, the width and construction cross section of the Pedestrian Path?•
How are wash crossings to be accommodated for the Pedestrian Path?•
The Pedestrian Path route should be designed to minimize crossings of the park's mountain bike trails. Some modification of the routing shown on the plan may need to occur.•
The Fantasy Island mountain bike trails are uni-directional, therefore "Do Not Enter" signs will need to be added on one side of each mountain bike trail crossing.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
02/06/2020 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change III.G.4 Architectural Review & Self-Certification at Time of Building Permits, given the extent of architectural character, design, and detail presented in this PAD document for Saguaro Trails, no separate or subsequent architectural review process is required for the project. The only protocol that will apply in this regard is the substantial conformance of the ultimate residences and structures with the aesthetics, architectural concept, building elevations, colors, and materials presented herein. The builder shall, at the time of submittal for building permits to PDSD, submit an accompanying sealed letter certifying this substantial conformance and referencing applicable Section III.G of this PAD.

Saguaro Trails PAD Section III.B.2.B - Demonstrate compliance with this section. A residential density "running table" shall be provided on each individual tentative resubdivision plat as residential development proceeds over the life of the project. The structure and content of this running table shall be developed in conjunction with PDSD staff prior to submittal of the first residential resubdivision plat; an updated version of the same table shall then appear on each subsequent resubdivision plat until full residential build-out is completed and the final density is determined.
02/07/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
02/12/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

Identification and Descriptive Data

The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide Case # D20-0007 on each sheet.

Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD 30 document.

Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply
02/12/2020 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The "attached PDF" mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the "Documents" section.)

DP20-0007 Tentative Plat for Saguaro Trails, Block 6, Lots 1-213 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570
02/12/2020 DJELLEN1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments.
02/12/2020 DJELLEN1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Jellen
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Saguaro Trails Block 6
Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0007

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 4, 2020
DUE DATE: February 12, 2020

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 9, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - Orient Sheet 37 so that it complies with the standard above.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - State in the title block legal description that the development is "A resubdivision of Block 6…"


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0007, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Add Drexel Road to the location map as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing use of the property as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Clarify what the December 2020 date means. It is listed in the title block with the associated case numbers. Additionally, clarify what the case number P19W means.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - If applicable, provide any additional easement information that is missing from the tentative plat, as noted by the standard above. Provide documentation showing that the 100' Right of Way to Tucson Gas and Electric Company easement was abandoned.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C - Clarify the reason for only using Common Areas "B, C, and E" and not "A and D." Additionally, clarify the use of area that is adjacent to lots 1 and 2.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Identify the existing zoning classifications to the west and north of the development as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Label the allowed maximum building height on sheet 40 next to the Typical Lot Setback per the PAD.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Clarify whether the development will utilize a gang mailbox. If so, provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable, provide the information noted by the standard above.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Jellen at (520) 837-4082 or by email David.Jellen@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
02/12/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Plan/Tentative Plat submitted on January 14, 2020. A preliminary electrical drawing is in process. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the final plat in order for TEP to approve.

If there are any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744.
Thank you,
Mary Burke, Senior Right of Way Agent
Tucson Electric Power Co., Land Resources – RC 131
3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714-2114
Office - 520-917-8744,Cell - 520-401-9895, mburke@tep.com
02/13/2020 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Per section D107.1 of the 2018 International Fire Code, a residential development of 30 houses or more require two access points. Please review this section and revise plans to be compliant.
02/14/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. There are two manholes labeled #1.
2. Verify the following lots that appear to need the installation of a backwater valve: 13, 7, 24, 35-40, 53, 86- 90, and 207. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.
3. Verify the following lots appear to not require the installation of a backwater valve: 152-154, 158, and 167. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.
02/19/2020 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP20-0007

1) Page 121 of the drainage report shows a retained water depth of 1.17' for basin G, and 1.05' for basin C. Confirm through infiltration testing that the basin drawdown time, below the weir, will be less than 12 hrs. Reference COT Stormwater Detention/Retention manual, section 3.5
2) Please provide typical site visibility triangles in both directions for each proposed intersection. For example, a person headed north on B street turning right onto J Street
3) Sheet 5. Add Keynote 11 to the Keynotes
4) Confirm that Drexel Rd does not continue running west and update the name of the north-south running road which Drexel turns into if needed
5) Two access routes into the subdivision may be required. Please refer to TFD comments
6) This project will require a pre-construction meeting prior to issuance of the development package permit. Project will require EOR certification prior to final inspection

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
02/20/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Steps: Resubmittal with a Comment Response Letter

DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE PLAT - Saguaro Trails, Block 6. Residential Lots 1-213. CA "B" (drainage), "C" (drainage,recreation,landsc), and "E" (public/private utilities).

PERMIT: DP20-0007
For faster service, please enter this number in the Filedrop's "Project Description" field.

FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.
SEE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number
- Permits section, click on blue tab
- Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document
- Reviews section, click on Review Details

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff
- Filedrop: In the Project Description field, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Name your 2nd submittal documents to start with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/20/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed