Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0005
Parcel: 12511140D

Address:
910 N RICHEY BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0005
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/04/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/06/2020 SBEASLE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Date: February 5, 2020

From: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-call Design Professional

To: Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD)

Re: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review DP20-0005 910 N Richey Blvd.

After review, based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M.1 - 4, of the required documents submitted to PDSD, I recommend approval with condition(s) on this project, as noted below:
1. Apply recommendations called out in submitted PMP letter. No balconies will be placed at said lot locations, and opaque window film or clerestory windows with sills above five feet will be applied on all second story levels facing single story properties. Also, provide evidence that no drainage problems will effect adjacent properties.

END OF DP REVIEW
02/11/2020 MROSS2 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please indicate location of proposed fire service line and proposed and/or existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. If greater than 600' to furthest part of new building, an additional fire hydrant will be required.
02/12/2020 SAMUEL ROGERS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Samuel Rogers - Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 910 N Richey Blvd. - FLD
Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0005

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/3/2020
DUE DATE: 2/11/2020

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 07, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 - Provide the north arrow and scale for the vicinity map. Provide the contour interval on the grading plan. Move the north arrow on the site plan so it's legible.


2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.10 - The legend appears to be missing several symbols related to utilities.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS


3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - Provide the email address of the Land Surveyor.


4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A - Provide a name for the subdivision in the title block.


5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide a brief legal description in the title block. (Ex: Tentative Plat for "subdivision name" Lots 1-6 and common areas A, B, C, D, and E.)


6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C - Provide the number of proposed units and common areas in the title block. Indicate the project is an FLD in the title block.


7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0005, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.


8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - Remove map and plat numbers from the vicinity map, they will be required on the Final Plat location map.

The project location map must cover approximately 1 square mile, extend the map southward to Broadway Blvd.


9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Provide and label Broadway Blvd. on the project location map.


10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Provide the section corners on the southern corners of the vicinity map at Broadway & Country Club, and Broadway & Alvernon.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes


11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The proposed use should be: FLD Multifamily use, subject to UDC section 8.7.3.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:


12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Provide the building floor area in the footprint of each building.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.


13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide the site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system on all sides of the site.


14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - Dimension all applicable easements on the plan.



15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type (public) and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks on Richey Blvd.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C - Label and dimension common areas. The parking area will need to be included as a common area.


17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning classifications across Richey Blvd.


18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Provide site visibility triangles at the entrance.


19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Provide the dimension of the egress/ingress off of Richey Blvd.


20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - A 24' PAAL is required behind all parking spaces, including the most northeastern space.


21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide dimensions of motor vehicle spaces and location of ADA accessible spaces. Correct UDC sections noting the parking reductions, see section 7.4.5.E.3 & .7. Add ADA space calculation to the Zoning Data Table. Provide a detail drawing of the accessible parking space (8') and Accessible Aisle (8'). Decomposed granite is not allowed to be used for parking spaces.


22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a calculation indicating the total required number of bicycle parking spaces. Short term bicycle parking must be evenly distributed throughout the complex. Provide a detail of how the short term bike parking will function in the location where the parking will exist on the site. Provide a note that each unit will have long term bike parking within the unit. Provide a detail of where the bike parking is proposed.


23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Detached accessory structures are not allowed in the front perimeter yard in the R-2 zone. The canopy cannot extend past the 1 bedroom unit into the front yard. Additionally, provide the height of the canopy on the elevation. The height information is required to determine the applicable setback distances. A one foot setback from the parking canopy to the PAAL is required; provide this dimension on the site plan.


24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).


25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Keynote 15 does not appear to be on the site plan. Indicate that the street sidewalk is proposed.


26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Add a note indicating whether signage is proposed for this development and that all signage must be approved under a separate permit.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)


27. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.A - Per Table 8.7.3-1: Provide, by note on the plan, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD.


28. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B Show the maximum developable area of the entire site.


2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:


29. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A - The required street setback is 1.5x the height of the structure. Based on the 21'-9" height provided, the required setback is 32.63'. Additionally, dimension the height of the pop-out on the west side of building 1. Provide a detail of the trellis with the height so that setback requirements may be determined.


30. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.B - Compliance with the applicable UDC Section 8.7.3.C.3.b criteria must be demonstrated by written report or the site plan, whichever is appropriate.


31. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C - Required pedestrian walkways may not count towards functional open space requirements. Delineate the location of the functional open space more clearly. Indicate how the flexible open space designated on the plan complies with city requirements. Functional open space is a designed element of the development and has a functionally described and planned use as an active or passive recreational amenity for the direct benefit of the residents and guests of the development. Examples include: landscaped areas which provide visual relief, shade, screening, buffering, and other environmental amenities; nature trails; exercise trails; active recreation areas (e.g., playgrounds, baseball fields, multiuse areas); picnic areas and facilities; recreation areas and facilities (e.g., swimming pools, tennis courts; golf courses).


32. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E - Provide a note indicating that an Architectural Variation Plan is not required per 8.7.3.M.1.b.


33. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F - The site is adjacent to a 1-story single-family residence to the south. Per 8.7.3.M.2.b.1: Privacy mitigation is required when multistory residences are proposed adjacent to existing single story residences and the existing residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. A Privacy Mitigation Plan will be required.


34. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the site plan the units that must provide privacy mitigation.


35. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions.


36. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC.


37. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 - A CC&R regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property will be required prior to the approval of this plan (Indicate if the owner will be responsible for maintenance of functional open space, parking area, detention basins, etc.).


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Samuel Rogers at (520) 837-6932 or by email Samuel.Rogers@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
02/12/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Add case # DP20-0005

8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)

Verify the following have been met.

Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements
1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.
2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:
a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,
b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.
3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual.
4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section.
5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.
6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

The following information must be provided on the landscape plans:

Screening

a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
02/12/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
02/13/2020 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Needs Review This project has a balance due. Review will be scheduled once the fee is paid.
Thank you
Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV - 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-9623
02/13/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal with a Comment Response Letter

NOTE: All City of Tucson offices will be closed on Monday, February 17 (except for emergency services). Planning & Development Services will re-open on Tuesday: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/contact-us-hours-service.

DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING/ FLD - Casitas on Richey.

PERMIT: DP20-0005
For faster service, please include this number in the Filedrop's "Project Description" field.

FEES DUE: $ 2,671.01
Note: A payment is required before we can accept your resubmittal.
PAYMENT OPTIONS Please pay the total fees (or Review Fees at a minimum):
1. Online Payment
2. In person at the City Permit Counter (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM)
3. By mail - a check payable to the City of Tucson (address is below), include the Activity Number

Online Payment
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/online-resources-fees-maps-records
1. NOTE: It may take 1-2 days for complete permit information to be available online
2. Visa, MC, Discover, American Express
3. Not case-sensitive but a hyphen is needed, for example: dp19-2000
4. Enter your Permit Nbr. and click the Continue tab
5. Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
6. If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer

SEE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number
- Permits section, click on blue tab
- Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document
- Reviews section, click on Review Details

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff
- Filedrop: In the Project Description field, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Name your 2nd submittal documents to start with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
02/13/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change February 12, 2020
1. Include all notes required by Administrative Manual Section2-06.
2. Multifamily developments with 6 units require centralized waste collection. Use of individual containers will require the approval of Environmental Services and will require a TSMR.
3. Use of an alternative surface for vehicle use areas will require permission from the PDSD Civil Engineer. Provide justification for the alternative surface and specifications for installation and maintenance.
4. Clearly show with proposed grading and drainage patterns how runoff will be directed to the water harvesting areas.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/13/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed