Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0300
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP19-0300 Flex Space at Sunset Ranch is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Addresses will be issued upon DP approval as 2706 N Silverbell Rd plus Building Numbers as shown on DP. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570 |
| 01/09/2020 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 01/09/2020 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Flex Space at Sunset Ranch - 2706 N Silverbell Rd Development Package (1st Review) DP19-0300 - C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9th, 2019 DUE DATE: January 14th, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 10th, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0300, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the proposed uses based on the UDC. Clarify if the food service is including or excluding a soup kitchen, specify which type of retail is proposed, and revise the office use to "Administrative and Professional Office" Provide the use specific standards that apply to each use as per UDC 4.8.6 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E - Clarify the process and status of lot split S19-040, if lot split is being processed in conjecture with this DP, the proposed lot lines should be shown on plan. Include the lot split case number on the plan below the DP number. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - The area to the west of the property north of Silver vista is zoned R-1, while the area immediately to the south of Silver Vista is zoned SR, revise the adjacent zoning classifications on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Distribute the 4 long term bicycle parking across each of the 4 new buildings. Each building should have long term bicycle storage. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - If applicable, provide the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Show the building setback line from Silverbell Rd to building 1 and building 4 on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Show access from building 1 to the dumpster directly south. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - If mail is to be received inside the building, make a general note stating it as such. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - add a general note stating that all signs require a separate permit. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 837-4082 or by email Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/13/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/14/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case # DP19-0300. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section apply to the following: A. All new development; and, B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below: 1. Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Scenic Route Street landscape borders on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route are subject to the standards of Section 5.3.4,Scenic Route Buffer Area. A buffer area in accordance with Section 5.3.4, Scenic Route Buffer Area, is required on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route . g. Landscaping on Adjacent Sites Existing drought tolerant vegetation on adjacentsites must be considered in design to prevent abrupt changes in plant types and to maintain a visual continuity along street frontage. The site is within the following overlay zone: 5.3. SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) 5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA A. Requirement 1. A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state; 2. No development or improvements shall occur in a Scenic Route buffer area except as provided in Section 5.3.4.C, Permitted Improvements; (See Figure 5.3-B.) 3. The buffer area shall be restored as closely to its natural state as possible in areas where public safety or the delivery of public services precludes preservation of existing vegetation. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 01/15/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Grading & Paving General Note 11 states that the elevations were shortened for clarity by removing the thousand and hundred unit values. On that basis, the building FFE values are about 100-feet above the average site grade. Provide elevation values that are consistent. |
| 01/15/2020 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/16/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the grades on the plan. Grading and Paving note 11 indicates the grades are shortened by omitting the thousand and hundred digits. The resulting notations don't seem to be consistent. 2. Explain and clearly show how water harvesting is maximized. |
| 01/16/2020 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 01/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE A resubmittal with a Comment Response Letter is required. Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Flex Space at Sunset Ranch - commercial retail complex. Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0300 Please include this number on all future correspondence and in Filedrop's "Project Description" field. Manager: Mallory.Ress@TucsonAz.gov or (520) 837-6933 Fee Balance: $0 (zero) View documents and reviewer's comments on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on Review Details YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit the following items to the Filedrop - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number - Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 01/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | The only Parks-related facility associated with this parcel is the inclusion of the "Silverbell Path" as shown in the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan. This path has already been constructed with the recent roadway improvements to Silverbell Road, so no further Parks-related facilities are necessary. The COT Parks and Recreation Department recommends approval of this development plan. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/13/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 12/13/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/13/2019 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no impact to any ADOT facilities. Thank you. -- Tom J. Martinez TMartinez@Azdot.gov |
| 12/13/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 12/13/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 12/13/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |