Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP19-0279
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/02/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Active | |
| 09/02/2022 | ANY | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Active | |
| 09/02/2022 | ANY | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Active | |
| 09/16/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Mission Hills FLD – Lots 1-14 Development Package (3rd Review) DP19-0279 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2022 DUE DATE: September 29, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 14, 2022. 1. Zoning acknowledges your response to this comment but there was nothing attached. Provide this information on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Article 5.3.6 are met. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. No Note 17 is provided and Keynote 16 appears to point to Common Area “C”COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – General Note 22 states that a gang mailbox will be used, show the mailbox on the plan. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 3. This comment was not clearly addressed. The note “FUNCTIONAL OPEN SPACE 1,567 SF (PART OF CA “C” points to the sidewalk along the cul-de-sac. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly delineate the functional Open space on sheet 2. It appears that the slopes may be steep to function. 4. Zoning was not able to find the elevations. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. 5. This comment was not addressed. Sheet 2 Keynote 11 references “SEE SHEET 4 FOR DETAILS” but the details have been removed from the plan. Clearly indicated on the plan or detail that the maximum allowed height of the wall above the retaining portion is 6’-0”.COMMENT: Terrace wall section & Cut wall section provide a dimension that shows that no more than 6’-0” wall is allowed above the retaining portion of the wall. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/22/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comment 2 - comment response says now shown as keynote 17 - there is no keynote 17 and keynote 16 calls out a gang mailbox but the label on the plans is not pointing to anything. Revise as needed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/27/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/28/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The revised manhole rim elevations and revised finished floor elevations show that back water valves are only required for lots 2 and 3. No other lots may have backwater valves. [Initial comment: Revise the site utility drawing to indicate where backwater valves will be required. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 10/03/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Fire department access that exceeds 150' shall have a compliant turn around provided. Cul-de-sac shall meet the requirements of the 2018 IFC, Appendix D, 96' wide. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner Tucson Fire Department |
| 10/07/2022 | JCARLTO1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comment 4 - comment response says ‘See engineers sheet 3 for screening wall detail’. - please call out on landscape plan where the screen wall is and add a note as to where the detail can be found. Revise as needed. Matthew Carlton matthew.carlton@tucsonaz.gov |