Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP19-0279
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. A SWPPP will be required prior to issuance of the grading permit. 2. Show the gang mailbox on the plans mentioned in general note 22. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Peter Salonga Tue 2/22/2022 8:30 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP19-0279 DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE PLAT / FLD - Mission Hills. 2950 S MISSION RD FEE BALANCE: $ 433.29 ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title the THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 02/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 12/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Mon 12/13/2021 3:36 PM Mission Hills, 2nd Submittal Review: DP19-0279 is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 12/14/2021 10:01 AM 1. Sheet 2, add to note No. 7, "Per P.A.G. standard 203." David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 12/15/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Mission Hills FLD – Lots 1-14 Development Package (1st Review) DP19-0279 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2021 DUE DATE: December 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 14, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Owner/Developer listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP19-0279, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes 4. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 5. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 3 to show that the FLD Subdivision is subject to UDC Article 8.7.3. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – List the following SCZ notes: UDC 5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA A. Requirement: a. A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state; b. No development or improvements shall occur in a Scenic Route buffer area except as provided in Section 5.3.4.C, Permitted Improvements; (See Figure 5.3-B.) c. The buffer area shall be restored as closely to its natural state as possible in areas where public safety or the delivery of public services precludes preservation of existing vegetation; and, d. The buffer area is in lieu of the landscape border required along street frontages under Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards. C. Permitted Improvements The following improvements are permitted in the Scenic Routes buffer area: a. Trenching for the placement of utility lines, if the area is re-vegetated in accordance with Section 5.3.4.D, Re-vegetation of Site; b. An area not larger than 18 square feet and not exceeding 30 inches in height per lot or parcel for the placement of utility transformers, pedestals, and service meters and hookups for utilities; and, c. Selected vegetation may be removed when the Department of Transportation determines that removal is necessary for public safety if the removed plants are replaced with native vegetation. D. Re-vegetation of Site: a. portion of the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way disturbed by development activity shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. b. Within the SCZ, excluding the Scenic Routes buffer area, all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. c. In areas not visible from the Scenic Corridor Zone, vegetation may consist of native plants indigenous to the site or drought tolerant plant material. Oasis area landscaping material may also be planted within this area at the levels permitted by the landscaping ordinance. E. Cut and Fill: a. Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one-foot rise or fall over a three-foot length. UDC 5.3.9 UTILITIES: a. All new utilities for development on private property and on public right-of-way along Scenic Routes shall be underground. UDC 5.3.10 ADDITIONAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: a. Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. Single-family dwellings, except in subdivisions recorded after May 28, 1985, are exempt from this standard. b. Fencing and freestanding walls facing the Scenic Route shall meet the material restrictions in Section 7.6.5, Screening Standards. Signs are required to comply with the following: a. Section 3-32, Scenic Route District, of Chapter 3, Advertising and Outdoor Signs, of the Tucson Code; b. Signs shall use colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones; c. No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within 400 feet of the right-of-way line on any Scenic Route; and, d. When the standards of this section and Section 3-32 conflict, the more restrictive of the two prevails 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Article 5.3.6 are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Mission Rd is designated as Arterial Scenic on the COT MS&R map provide a general note on the plan stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) & UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Mission Rd, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C – The title block calls out “COMMON AREA A, B, C & D” but the only common area labeled on the plan is “COMMON AREA B”. Label all common areas on the plan. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels south of Mission Rd. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Until comments 9 has been addressed the requirements for future SVT’s cannot be determined. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – It does not appear that the existing cross section for Mission Rd meets the 120’ section provided in the COT MS&R plan. If not show the future curb and sidewalk on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Under General Note 8 you list “SOUTH (GLENN STREET)” where is Glenn St. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – General Note 22 states that a gang mailbox will be used, show the mailbox on the plan. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 17. COMMENT: -06.5.3.B – Under General Note 3 you list 8.7.3.C.3.b (6) as a way to qualify for the maximum density option but this site is not located within the City ’s Central Core. Remove this reference from the plan. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly delineate the functional Open space on sheet 2. It appears that the slopes may be steep to function. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 – If available provide two copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. Otherwise the CC&R's shall be provided at final plat review. 21. COMMENT: Terrace wall section & Cut wall section provided a dimension that shows that no more than 6’-0” wall is allowed above the retaining portion of the wall. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/16/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site utility drawing to indicate where backwater valves will be required. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/17/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 12/16/2021 9:07 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 12/21/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Mission Hills FLD Subdivision ACTIVITY NO: DP19-0279 Address: 2950 S MISSION RD Zoning: R-1 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 21, 2021 DUE DATE: December 15, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, required trees and functional open space for FLD, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c, 2-10.6., UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 2. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Mission Rd. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 3. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 4. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 5. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC Administrative Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards Manual 5-1.0, please be specific. 6. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 7. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 8. The NPPO is intended to encourage preservation in place of healthy native plants through sensitive site design that minimizes the disruption of areas within the site containing healthy plants while allowing for salvage and transplanting plants on the site that are likely to survive. The viability of inventoried plants is very low for Mesquites, Acacias and Blue Palo Verdes, please submit photos or schedule a site visit for acceptance. 9. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities. 10. Add the following note to the Native Plant Preservation Plan - The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. 11. A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state, please dimension the Scenic Corridor along Mission Rd. 12. No development or improvements shall occur in a Scenic Route buffer area except as provided in Section 5.3.4.C, Permitted Improvements; (See Figure 5.3-B.) 13. The buffer area shall be restored as closely to its natural state as possible in areas where public safety or the delivery of public services precludes preservation of existing vegetation. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/29/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show existing and new fire hydrants Plans shall show the entry width and access length to turn around Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 12/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To: CDRC Tue 12/28/2021 12:16 PM Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed, and plans received, November 19th, 2021 . Please note that TEP is awaiting customer to provide Preliminary Construction Design. At this point we cannot approve. If there are any questions, please contact Land Resources at tepdevrev@tep.com. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department Diane Geerligs, Renee Marruffo |