Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP19-0261
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/04/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: Wildcat Village, 1050 E 8th St Development Package (3rd Review) DP19-0261 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 3, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2020. 1. Previous comments not addressed. UDC Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.3 - When assigned a case number for the Individual Parking Plan (or Variance), provide the case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (This can be indicated with placeholder text until a case number is assigned). 2. As per previous comments, UDC Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.a requires parking spaces and parking area access lanes to be designed to City standards. The illustrated parking does not meet standards. See comments below. a. The parking to the north of the building does not meet City maneuverability standards. A two-way parking area access lane is shown at 18 ft but is required at 24 ft. This area may be redesigned to accommodate angled parking and an one-way parking area access lane. See UDC Article 7.4.6.D. This will likely result in the loss of some parking spaces. If handicap accessible parking is redesigned to be angled, the striped access path adjacent to van accessible spaces must be on the driver's side. b. The parking to the north of the building includes one space which encroaches into the right-of-way. This space cannot be counted towards provided parking. c. The parking to the south of the building does not meet City maneuverability and dimensional standards. A two-way parking area access lane is shown at 20 ft but is required at 24 ft. As 65.2 ft is indicated from property line to building wall, there may be sufficient room to redesign this area to accommodate 18 ft parking space depth, 24 ft access aisle, 18 ft parking space depth and a 4 ft sidewalk. d. Vehicle wheel stops are required in parking areas to the north and south of the building. The wheel stops will prevent vehicle overhang into the sidewalk clear area. 3. Based on review of the parking spaces and access lanes, there are two options to proceed: a. Re-design parking areas to the north and south of the building to meet City standards. Zoning review will be required to verify conformance and total parking spaces provided prior to submittal of an Individual Parking Plan. b. If re-design of the parking areas is not desired, a Variance will be required for both the non-standard parking area dimensions and the total number of provided parking spaces. An Individual Parking Plan would no longer be an option. 4. Previous comments not fully addressed. UDC Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Handicap accessible signage is required. Provide details on development package. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. 5. Previous comments not fully addressed. UDC Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - It is acknowledged the bicycle parking calculations have been corrected. However, I am unable to verify whether the actual number provided is accurate, as appropriate details have not been provided. See following comment. 6. Previous comments not addressed. UDC Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. It is acknowledged some information has been provided on the plan. However, information is not sufficient. Dimensions and maneuverability standards per the UDC must be met and illustrated on the development package. 7. The comments in this transmittal regarding parking need to be resolved prior to submitting for the Individual Parking Plan (IPP). Other needed corrections to the development package can be continued to be processed while the IPP is pending. However, final approval of the development package cannot be obtained until the IPP is approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/05/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required. Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0261 Include this number on all future correspondence. Project Description: SITE - Wildcat Village Fee Balance: $0 (zero). To view documents and Reviewer's comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later as data transfers to PRO periodically.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on "Review Details" Submit the following items to the Filedrop. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 3rd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |