Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0260
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/28/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 10/28/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 10/28/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 10/28/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 11/08/2019 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | `CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TROPICAL SMOOTHIE Development Package (1st Review) 10230 E OLD VAIL RD DP19-0260- C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2019 DUE DATE: November 26, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 23, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0260, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.5 - It appears that a site Map is placed on the first sheet. If so label the site map. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise General note 3 on sheet on to state " The existing use is Vacant The Proposed use Food service subject to use specific standard 4.9.4M.1&5 and 4.9.13.0 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Revise general note 18 to states that "this project has been designed to comply with the UDC section 5.6.8.C - ADC-3. " 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Provide all zoning classification as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Will outdoor seating be proposed if so include in calculation. Revise parking calculation with the correct one. 8. COMMENT: Per UDC section 7.4.7 Motor Vehicle stacking requirements the minimum vehicle stacking capacity (per drive-through lane) is 3 Vehicle spaces. Other design criterion is (1. Each stacking space must be a minimum of nine feet in width and 18 feet in length. 2. The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access.) 9. COMMENT: On sheet one Parking calculation provide a note the references S11-044. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - Provide the information noted by the standard above (Provide future MS&R sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - A cross access agreement will be needed to ensure access. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Draw label and dimension the building setback (for the West, east and south setbacks) as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - It appears that there are two square footage measurements being use on the building it is listed as 1,593 and on the parking calculation it is listed as 1600 sq ft. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - It appears that the pedestrian circulation along the south portion of the site will not work. Per UDC section 7.4.7.B "The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access". 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Revise general note 16 to state that "All signage will be permitted under separate permits" ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520) 837-4082 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/15/2019 | PCAMARE1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning Comments |
| 11/19/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation,(520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/26/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP19-0260 on each sheet. SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING 1.3 Applicability This standard applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. A Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall be submitted with all applications for commercial developments at which landscaping is required. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/02/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/02/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate pedestrian and accessible connectivity from this site to the shopping center and perimeter roads. |
| 12/02/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/04/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required. Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0260 Include this number on all future correspondence. Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Tropical Smoothie. Fee Balance: $0 (zero). To view documents and Reviewer's comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later as data transfers to PRO periodically.) - Home page, left side, “Activity Search”, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on "Review Details" Submit the following items to the Filedrop. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires Change” comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 3rd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 12/04/2019 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/04/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |