Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0254
Parcel: 14106020A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0254
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/23/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/23/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
10/23/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
10/23/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
10/23/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
11/06/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
11/06/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: New Mixed Use Development - Food Service and Veterinarian Uses
Development Package (1st Review) 7205 E Valencia Road
DP19-0254 - PAD 26 (Pima County Specific Plan)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 5, 2019
DUE DATE: November 21, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 17, 2020.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - List the Owner/Developer's contact name and email address on the cover sheet.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Revise the brief legal description listed in the title block of plan sheets, the recorded Map and Plat book and page numbers or sequence number.




2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Revise the sheet numbers and total sheets in the title block of sheets 8-14, i.e. 8 of 14, 9 of 14 etc.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0254, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List the administrative street address next to the title block of each sheet.


2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 - Provide on the cover sheet the reduced-scale map of the PAD as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Add the following to General note 8: This is designed to comply with the Regulations of the Gateway Route UDC Section 5.5.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Label the width of the curb to property lines from abutting streets. If sidewalks are for this development label and dimension the width of the street sidewalks.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E - Unless the lots are to be combined draw and label the existing lot lines include distance and bearings.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Label the zoning classifications to the north and south of the development as PAD 26 and the parcel to the west is zoned C-1.


2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Include dimensioned detail drawings for the covered parking structures. Draw and dimension the parking structures on the site plan and demonstrate that the structures will be setback 1 foot from the end of the parking spaces.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Label Kolb and Valencia roads as "Public Street" and label the recording information for each road.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The number of parking spaces required for Building 2 is 45. Per the parking calculations, 37 spaces have been provided. A board of adjustment variance is required to reduce the number of spaces.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Veterinary clinics are not required to be provided with bicycle parking; however the number required for short and long term should state "0 required". Revise the Total number of long term bicycle parking spaces provided to state (2 provided for each building)

Dimension the width island area between the 8 parking spaces and the drive-through for Building 2. If the parking spaces in this parking area are not provided with wheel stops the island shall be a minimum width of 2.5 feet to keep vehicles from possibly overhanging onto the drive-through lane.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - I believe that the PAD document requires a building setback of 60 feet from the Valencia Road and 30 feet from Kolb Road. Revise the setback lines and annotations accordingly.


2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - The onsite pedestrian circulation is to be continued and provided out to Loop Ramp along the north and the east portions of the site.


2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Clarify if recycle containers will also be provided.


2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - Demonstrate how the conditions of rezoning have been addressed as it applies to this development. Include a separate response memo for the rezoning conditions.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Clarify if mail to this development is to be delivered to each building or will there be a gang mail box provided. Add a general note if mail is to be delivered to each building. If a gang mail box is to be used draw and label the location on the site sheets.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Add a general note on the cover sheet that states that all signage will be processed under separate permit.


20. COMMENT: See Comments from John Beall related to any PAD requirements.



***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/18/2019 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change Date November 27, 2019
Project DP19-0254
Project Reviewer - Zelin Canchola

Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development plan.

1. Add sidewalk around the perimiter of property

2. Show improvements within right of way according to PAG Standard details. including sidewalk and ramps

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
11/20/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide Case # DP19-0254 on each sheet.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Address of site

Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions PAD -26 document.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING

1.3 Applicability
This standard applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

A Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall be submitted with all applications for commercial developments at which landscaping is required.

Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply
11/20/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or planned Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
11/21/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH 1, 2788.62) is about the same as the first floor elevation of Building #3 (2788.6). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
11/26/2019 MROSS2 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
11/27/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0254

1) Drainage report, summary table on page 157, indicates that the developed cfs for the 2 and 10 year rain events will exceed the pre-developed condition. This project is located within a balanced basin and as such is required to ensure that the 2,10 and 100 year flows in the developed condition do not exceed those of the pre-developed condition. Please revise as needed to meet this requirement. Reference stormwater detention/retention manual section 2.1
2) Provide percolation testing to Verify that the drawdown time for the proposed retention basins is less than 12 hours
3) Page 155 of the drainage report indicates that there are three retention basins 0.75' in depth and one at 1.9' in depth. DP sheet 5 indicates a depth of 1' for the basin south of PAD 1, 1' for the basin east of Bldg 1. The basin to the south of PAD is not labeled on sheet 5. The basin west of pad 5 has a bleed pipe at the bottom. It's not clear how a retention depth is being provided. Please clarify and update as needed to show the correct basin depths
4) Drainage report page 13 indicates an onsite wash between 100 and 500 cf. Show on plans the 100 year flood plain limits, proposed vs developed. Any flow over 100 cfs is regulatory and as such an environmental resource report with a corresponding mitigation plan is needed. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual section 4-02.2.C
5) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3
6) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each of the proposed basins. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future
7) Show on plans a minimum 5' wide sidewalk along N Loop Ramp. Reference TSM section 10-01.4.1.A.1.a
8) Provide pedestrian circulation connections from the proposed buildings to N Loop Ramp. Reference TSM section 7-01.4.1.D
9) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8-01.8.0

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
12/02/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved
12/02/2019 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The "attached PDF" mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the "Documents" section.)

DP19-0254/ 1st subm. for review/ Bassett is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570
12/03/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
- A resubmittal is required.

Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0254
Include this number on all future correspondence.

Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Bassett Property, commercial use.

Fee Balance: $0 (zero).
To view documents and Reviewer's comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later as data transfers to PRO periodically.)
- Home page, left side, “Activity Search”, enter the Activity Number
- Permits section, click on blue tab
- Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document
- Reviews section, click on "Review Details"

Submit the following items to the Filedrop.
In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number.
PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires Change” comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff
4) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, 3rd Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
12/03/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approved We have reviewed the DP19-0254 and the proposed development land uses (Veterinarian and Restaurants) are allowed and will not impact our mission as presented in the plans.
Should the proposed land uses change during planning, please contact us to review the changes.
The delay in review of this particular development proposal was due to zoning and allowable land use code interpretation conflicts between County and Annexation zoning. This proposed land use is not the land use in question.
Thank you
B. Kacey Carter, Civ USAF
Base Community Planner
355th Civil Engineer Squadron/CENPP
Davis-Monthan AFB AZ
520-228-3291, bonnie.carter@us.af.mil

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/03/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed