Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0210
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/11/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/16/2019 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Diamond Motors - Retail - New Vehicle Rental and Sales Development Package (1st Review) 1717 N Stone Ave DP19-0210 - C-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16th, 2019 DUE DATE: September 30th, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 30th, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - Provide the drafters name, drafting company mailing address, and any other unlisted contact information for the drafter as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0210, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Provide a north arrow for the location map 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - The gross area of the lot shown on sheet 1 (7,503 SF) does not match the proposed lot size shown on sheet 2 (8,100 SF). The actual gross area of the site according to the Pima County Assessor's parcel information is 7,503 SF 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Provide percentage calculations for building coverage. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Revise the gross lot area in the Motor Vehicle, Bicycle and Parking section of sheet 2 to correct size as mentioned in the previous comment. Number of vehicle parking spaces provided in the "Motor Vehicle, Bicycle and Parking" section of sheet 2 (4 spaces provided) do not reflect the number shown on the site plan on sheet 2 (3 spaces provided). Please revise the site plan on all sheets and the mentioned section on sheet 2 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Revise keynote 8 on sheet 2 to read "long term" instead of "long time" According to the exception noted in 7.4.8.B.a.1, no long term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Revise the "Min. Bicycle Parking Spaces" section on sheet 2 to show the actual required (0) and add a note stating the exemption stated above. Code does not require long term bicycle parking on this site. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - if applicable, provide the information as noted in the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - The setback shown for the east side of the proposed building (3'6") is not code compliant. The required setback for a non-residential use to a residential zone in a Commercial zone is 1 ½ *(H) based on table 6.3-4.A of the UDC. In this case the setback for the east side of the building would be 18'. A DDO (design development option) is available for reduction of setbacks. This process requires a separate application. For more information on this application visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/2019_DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC.pdf or contact Iman Monshizadeh at Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Provide the information regarding refuse collection areas as noted in the standard above ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 837-4082 or at Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/24/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide the Case # DP19-0210 on plans. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 30" screen is required along Stone Ave to screen vehicle use area. The following information must be provided on the plans Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). SECTION 4-02.0.0: FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ERZ STANDARDS This site is within FEMA Floodplain. At a minimum Floodplain Use Permits will be required. Encroachment in Regulated Areas If the project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following. 1. Environmental Resource Report. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC. DSD may grant waivers where the elements or full report are not required by code. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 09/25/2019 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 10/01/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9240-06, 2374.51') is higher than the first floor elevation (2374.50'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/16/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. In the drainage report, determine the erosion hazard setback and determine whether any change in water surface elevation will be expected from this development. 2. Clarify on the plans where the retaining wall is proposed. 3. The section callouts AA and BB do not match the corresponding section details. 4. Clearly identify existing and proposed grades throughout the site. It appears the proposed grading may require the differential grading procedure. |
| 10/17/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0210 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - Diamond Motors, car lot with office. Project Manager: Samuel.Rogers@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-6932 The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for the payment. To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data uploads to PRO periodically.) Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires changes” comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |