Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP19-0201
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
10/15/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 10' wall requires |
10/15/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
10/15/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TEP Tucson Substation Development Package (3rd Review) 247 W 4TH ST DP19-0201 - C-3 , I-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 16, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 21, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) The plan has been reviewed for consistency with the structural plan. It does not appear that the DP plans as it relates to the perimeter walls are consistent. The walls do not meet section 6.6.2.J of the UDC because they do not comply with the perimeter yard standards. A Board of Adjustment Variance is required for the wall setbacks. Include a general note that provides the following information related to the Board of Adjustment Variance; case number, Date of approval and conditions of approval.(List as reference next to the title block the Board of Adjustments case number) Based on a wall height of 11' 4" address the following comments. Comment: The required setback on Eleventh Ave is 20' or 1 ½ times the height of the wall whichever is greater. (Zoning is considering 11 Ave as the Front Street and 4th and 5th streets as side streets) The proposed setback is Zero. Comment: The required setback on 4th street is 10'. The proposed setback is Zero. Comment: The required setback on the North East 132 linear feet portion of the property is adjacent to the R-3 zone, the required setback is 1 ½ times the height of the wall. The proposed setback is Zero. Comment: The required setback for the South East portion of the property along 5th Street the required setback is 10'. A portion of the wall along the South East is in the 10ft setback. Comment: It appears that the proposed location of the gate located on the North East portion of the site will block an access ramp. It is suggested that access on the North East portion should be relocated off 4th St right of way. If access on 4th St is not available and alley access is required to access the site as a secondary access point, a board of adjustment variance review and approval will required: (see applicable codes sections below, Alley access is allowed for the uses listed below UDC section 7.4.6.K.1.a-c.) Per UDC section 7.4.6.K. Use of Street or Alley for Maneuvering Area A street or alley can not be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way, except as follows: 1. The following uses are permitted to use a street or alley for access and maneuvering: a. Residential uses (including, but not limited to, single-family dwellings, mobile home dwellings, duplexes on individual lots, and Residential Care Services) that require four or fewer off-street motor vehicle parking spaces; b. Home occupations; or, c. Non-residential uses within contributing properties to a National Register Historic District. 2. An alley, when used for access, must be a minimum of 20 feet wide, free of obstructions, and surfaced with a dust control method that is acceptable to the TDOT City Engineer. 3. A street may be used for maneuvering directly into or from a parking space, provided the parking space is located completely within the right-of-way and the design of the parking layout is approved by the TDOT City Engineer. 4. These exceptions are not applicable on MS&R designated streets as provided in the MS&R Plan. Comment: Assure that DP package drawing and structural package drawing are consistent. Per UDC section 6.6.2.J - In nonresidential zones, walls or fences, as permitted in Section 6.6.2.I above, may exceed the height standards, provided the wall or fence complies with the perimeter yard standards applicable to buildings on the site; ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520) 791-5550 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and structural plans |
10/15/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
10/16/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Board of Adjustment case; Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Obtain variance for 10' wall indicated in Keynote #25 on DP. Include variance case number and any conditions imposed. The following comments are relative to an application for a Board of Adjustment Variance (UDC 3.11.1). The parcel is bordered by streets on the north, east, and west sides of the property. The proposed CMU wall is 10 ft.in height one setback on the north, east, and west side of the property are required to be 20ft and the other two setbacks are required to be 10 ft.. The requested setback is 0 ft. on the north, east, and west sides of the property (TABLE 6.3-4.A/TABLE 6.3-5.A). |
10/18/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0201 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - TEP Tucson Substation, grading and drainage improvements. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for the payment. To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter the Permit/Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data uploads to PRO periodically.) Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires changes” comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
10/18/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |