Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0199
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/27/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/09/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Dutch Bros Coffee - New Food Service Development Package (1st Review) 6725 E. Tanque Verde Rd DP19-0199 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5th, 2019 DUE DATE: September 20th, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 19th, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0199, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Please identify the specific existing use for buildings 2 and 4. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - Please provide the information above if applicable. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Please revise proposed setbacks based on UDC table 6.3-4.A nonresidential zone to Residential zone. The setback is 1½ (H). The actual setback is 36' This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). A Commercial Development - food service is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4). See Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P The minimum setback when adjacent to a residential zone (RX-2) is 1.5(H). The proposed building height as noted on the DP is 24', the setback requirement is 1.5(24) =36'. If the applicant wishes to construct the new structure as proposed on the DP a DDO will be required. For additional information on the DDO process contact Mark Castro (520) 837-4979 or Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 791-5550 or by email Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/09/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/20/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide the Case # DP19-0199 on plans. 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 30" screen is required to screen vehicle use area from Tanque Verde Rd. The following information must be provided on the plans. Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening elements on plans Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 09/30/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The approach to the solid waste container seems to cross parking spaces. Clarify the solid waste vehicle maneuvering areas. 2. Clarify whether there is an easement for the trail crossing the property. Show the extent of the easement, if applicable. 3. Clearly indicate the status of the rip rap swale in the river park property. If any work is proposed within the river park property, review and approval by Pima County Regional Flood Control District is required. |
| 09/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0199 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - Dutch Bros, Tanque Verde. Project Manager: Mallory.Ress@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-6933 The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for your payment. To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data uploads to PRO periodically.) Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |