Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP19-0196
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
08/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
08/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
08/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
08/21/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | The Environmental & General Services Department (EGSD) has reviewed the Development Package for the proposed La Terra Reserve residential subdivision to be located at 120 E Medina Road (DP19-0196). It is proposed to construct 40 single family residences at this location. Refuse and recycling materials will be picked up once per week in 95 gallon Automated Plastic Containers (APCs). The proposed La Terra subdivision is located within the service area for residential refuse pick-up for EGSD. The layout of the individual residential lots will allow access to each lot for servicing of the APCs. Based on this review, EGSD approves the Development Package for the proposed La Terra residential subdivision from a solid waste management standpoint. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department |
08/21/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
09/11/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the tentative plat for La Terra Reserve subdivision. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the final plat before TEP can approve. If there are any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke, Senior Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744, Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
09/11/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to indicate that backwater valves will not be required for lots 34 and 35 because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is more than 12" below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
09/12/2019 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The "attached PDF" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section) DP19-0196 / La Terra / 1st submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
09/17/2019 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
09/17/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
09/18/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide the Case # DP19-0196 on plans. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements 1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section. 2. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual. 3. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. 4. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD. 5. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: a. Tile; b. Stone; c. Brick; d. Adobe; e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or, f. Metal. Set Aside Methodology The preservation and mitigation standards of this section is satisfied by the set aside of an area of the site as Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in conformance with the following standards. The provisions of this section may be combined, or used in conjunction, with the Plant Inventory Methodology (Section 7.7.5.A.1) and/or the Plant Appraisal Methodology (Section 7.7.5.A.2), in accordance with Section 7.7.5.A.4, Combined Methodologies. Site Assessment An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) in accordance with Sections 2-03.5.0, Environmental Resource Report, and 2-11.4.5, Set Aside Submittal, of the Administrative Manual must be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density , and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site . The ERR shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this section. Any area left undisturbed as provided in this Section must be shown in the ERR , and no other assessment need be done for such areas. The natural resource value for an area is assessed by the consideration of factors such as: (1) Health, size, density, and variety of native plant specie (2) The visual resource value of the area(s); and, (3) The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site. (4) The Environmental Resource Report may be provided as individual illustrations and/or in report form, which may include photographs, maps, and illustrations; Area(s) to be set aside which will be platted in survivable and included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as NUOS. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
09/18/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | Request for review has been sent to Corky Poster. General Note #10 states AVP will be submitted prior to building permit issuance. |
09/19/2019 | PCAMARE1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
09/19/2019 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: La Terra Reserve Development Package (1st Review) 120 E Medina Rd DP19-0196 - R-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 18, 2019 DUE DATE: September 18, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 19, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above for all other registrants that prepared the development package. Provide an email address and phone number for the owner and provide an email address for the owner and developer and civil engineer. 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; 2. COMMENT: Provide a leader arrow that point to common area B on the cover sheet. For clarity of use label all common areas 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 3. COMMENT: Revise the page numbers on each sheet from X of 15 to X of 16. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0196, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet. 5. COMMENT: It appears that there are 16 pages, provide an updated index to include the 16th page for the erosion control plan 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 6. COMMENT: The development site is within the AHD, CUZ 2, and NCD 65-70 zones of the TIA AEZ. Demonstrate on the DP how the height restrictions will be met by including detail drawings of the proposed maximum height of the dwellings between the height restrictions of 112 to 128. The maximum height calculations utilizing the MSL at the end of Runways 11L and 11R and the MSL at the project site should be listed as a note under the AEZ notes. All lots in this development are affected by the AHD height restrictions. 7. COMMENT: Draw and label AEZ height lines that apply to this development. This information can be found on map Tucson under the AEZ overlay layer. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 8. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner. 9. COMMENT: Provide the bearings for all line work related to the Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) boundary 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 10. COMMENT: Indicate if 6th Ave and Medina Rd are public or private as per the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 11. COMMENT: Provide documentation from TDOT for the parking on medina. It appears that no parking is allowed on Medina Rd. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 12. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above for the dedication for the public right of way 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 13. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 14. COMMENT: Add the proposed building height in the typical lot setback detail E. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 15. COMMENT: Indicate if gang mailboxes are being proposed and indicate location as per the standard above. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 16. COMMENT: Is there signs being proposed if so, assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and, 17. COMMENT: Provide the developable area calculation as note on the plat per the standard above 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 18. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate; 19. COMMENT: Provide the Density calculation based on the acreage of the C-1 separately from the R-2 zoning. 2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations; 20. COMMENT: Define the functional open space. Show the calculation for the proposed and required functional open space as noted by the standard above. 2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows: 21. COMMENT: If applicable provide an architectural variation plan as noted by the standard above. 2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and, 22. COMMENT: If applicable identify on plan the lots that must provide architectural variation. 2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC. 23. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows: 24. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation; 25. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and, 26. COMMENT: : If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; 27. COMMENT: : If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above 28. COMMENT: See addition comment by design professional for the FLD 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 29. COMMENT: Provide the information noted by the standard above If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520) 837-4082 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
09/23/2019 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | (The Tucson Water - Will Serve Letter - can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section) |
09/26/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0196 1) The drainage report indicates that 17334 cf of retention is provided, exceeding the retention requirement. The report does not indicate what the retained volume requirement is. Since this development proposes development between 3-6 units per acre, 2 year threshold retention is required. Reference City of Tucson (COT) Stormwater Detention/Retention manual section 1.4 2) Provide a complete Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan upon next submittal 3) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each of the proposed detention basins. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future 4) Sheet 7 detail A. COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 2-01.9.2 requires The top of cut slopes shall not be made nearer to a site boundary line than one fifth of the vertical height of cut with a minimum of two feet (610 mm) and a maximum of ten feet (3,048 mm). Please adjust detail as needed to show that the drainage channel is more than 2' away from the adjacent property line 5) Show that the proposed new sidewalk extends completely along the projects frontage on Medina Road (East of Proposed S 4th Av) and along 6th Av (North of Proposed E Manor View Rd) 6) Clarify if both Common Area B's will be used for Passive or Active Recreation. If Active recreation is proposed then an accessible pathway will need to be provided to Common Area B to the North, as currently shown in the southern most common area B 7) Show on plans the 100 year water surface elevations and erosion hazard setback for the Valencia wash. Reference COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.8.I 8) COT Tucson Stormwater Management System (TSMS) shows a CFS value for the Valencia Wash as being 688 CFS where it crosses S Nogales HY. Existing conditions indicate that Old Nogales Hw and the Union Pacific Rail line have undersized infrastructure which divert flow to the north ultimately overtopping the rail line and Valencia rd. After review with the Floodplain Administrator, The City does not support the conclusion that the CFS value can be reduced below the currently shown TSMS value. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
09/26/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0196 Project Description: PLAT/FLD - La Terra Reserve, lots 1-40, common area "A" (natural open space), common area "B" (drain. and landsc), an FLD subdivision. Project Manager: Nicholas.Ross@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4029 The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for your payment. To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data uploads to PRO periodically.) Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
09/26/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |