Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP19-0165
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/22/2019 | SAMUEL ROGERS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Samuel Rogers Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Benedictine Monastery Apartments Development Package (2nd Review) DP19-0165 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/22/19 DUE DATE: 12/2/2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 8th, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - This comment is still applicable label C9-19-07 on the title block. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 10. 2-06.4.8.C - COMMENT: Revise recordation data for streets to accurately reflect correct map and plat book and page number. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. 2-06.4.9.A - This comment is still applicable provide lot combo documentation. COMMENT: All lots that are part of this development must be combined; lot lines are not allowed to cross buildings. Provide all combo documents prior to the approval of the DP. 12. 2-06.4.9.E - This comment is still applicable provide documentation for the abandonment request. COMMENT: Please clarify if lots are to remain in their current configuration, or if they are planned to be combined. There appears to be ROW between parcels 125130700 and 12513068A, if ROW is to be abandoned, contact John Cahill at the City of Tucson Real-estate Department. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - This comment still applies. COMMENT: If future ROW along Country Club Road is planned to be widened, the PAAL along Country Club will need to be reconfigured. It must be confirmed that either the ROW will not be taken, or the site will remain in compliance if the ROW is taken. A written notice from TDOT indicating that ROW will not be taken or a supplemental site plan demonstrating how the site will be configured if the ROW is taken will be required. Recommend speaking to Zelin Canchola or Fred Felix with TDOT before proceeding. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short term bike rack detail from the sheet 10 of the previous submittal has been removed. A short term bike rack detail is required, 18. 2-06.4.9.I - This comment still applies: COMMENT: On the next submittal provide the documentation for the abandoned Alley. 19. 2-06.4.9.J - This comment still applies, (see comment 15.) COMMENT: Per the MS&R Map future ROW on Country Club Rd. is 100ft, revise plan accordingly. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Samuel Rogers at (520) 837-6932 or by email sameul.rogers@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/29/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain any relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning and approved PAD document. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Street Landscape Border Street landscape borders are not required along street frontages where the landscaping standards of Section 5.3.4, Scenic Route Buffer Area, apply. e. Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) The Planning and Development Services Department Director may grant a complete or partial exception to the landscape border standards for development within a HPZ. The exceptions may be granted if, after completion of the HPZ development review required by the HPZ, the PDSD Director determines that the standards are not compatible with the character and design elements of the HPZ. f. Planned Area Development (PAD) For development adjacent to a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, the landscaping standards are those which are required for development adjacent to residential zones, except where an adjacent PAD District has been developed or planned for nonresidential uses. In that case, the landscaping standards are based on the adjacentland use. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/29/2019 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The "attached PDF" mentioned below can be viewed on: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the "Documents" section.) DP19-0165 / Benedictine Monastery Apartments / 2nd Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/04/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/06/2019 | NROSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | Design Professional has not yet reviewed. Please email nicholas.ross@tucsonaz.gov with qny questions. |
| 12/06/2019 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 12/09/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The waste stream calculation is not correct. The total weekly volume must be calculated using the requirements of Technical Standard 8-01. I estimate a waste stream of 104 cubic yards per week. Revise the plans accordingly. 2. The minimum volume for waste collection between service days for the multifamily use is 65 cubic yards. (Tucson Code 15-10). Revise the plans accordingly. 3. Provide a narrative explaining how the water harvesting standards of the PAD have been met. (PAD C.7) |
| 12/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE See details below - a resubmittal is required. Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0165 Include this number on all future correspondence. Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Benedictine Monastery Apts, redevelopment. Project Manager: Nicholas.Ross@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4029 Fee Balance: $0 (zero). To view documents and Reviewer's comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on "Review Details" Submit the following items to the Filedrop. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 3rd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |