Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/09/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet 1 1. Include all standard applicable notes found in the COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06, including but not limited to the hold harmless note in AM 2-06.4.7 and Drainage will remain in its natural state note. 2. General Note 29 references a geotechnical report was not submitted with this development package. This report will be required prior to approval of this plan set. Sheet 2 1. AM 2-06.3.5 Please provide space in lower right quadrant for approval block. 2. Please expand upon R/W information. 3. Make note for legend "All existing site features to remain unless otherwise noted" and combine with cover sheet legend. Sheet 3 1. Boundary information is difficult to read with gray wipeout. Please revise. 2. Indicate point of grade break along the proposed channel flowline. 3. All detail references are off by one sheet. Please check and revise all sheet references. 4. Please provide direction and distance to nearest existing sewer line. 5. Add keynote for handrail along the top of the outer edge of channel per the details. Linework added should appear on all sheets. 6. Indicate the 1% cross slope shown in detail C. 7. Contour grading is not reflected in the cross-section D. 8. Utility Keynote 3 - Provide geotechnical study indicating area is acceptable for percolation. 9. Grading Keynote 2 contains a misspelling. Sheet 5 1. Detail E is not referenced in the plan. Please reference this detail in the appropriate locations. 2. Revise horizontal scales appear incorrect on all details. 3. Provide pavement section on all details. Sheet 6 1. Provide dimension of channel with consideration of ability to maintain/clean channel. 2. Cross-section does not match contours shown on sheet 3 which indicates bench on one side of channel. Sheet 7 1. Contour grading shown on sheet 3 is not reflected in this portion of section. Please revise. 2. Correct spelling of riprap. 3. Provide detail of handrail to riprap connection. Drainage Statement Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please revise 3167 W. Tumamoc Drive to correct address or remove. 2. Please include statement regarding no detention retention requirements for single family lots and provide total acreage for site. 3. Please include discussion on maintenance responsibility for potential sediment accumulation due to low velocities and undisturbed upstream contributing area. 4. Please explain how flow spreads back to existing conditions to prevent concentrated flows from creating erosion in the right of way. Sheet 3 1. Existing Conditions Map - Please provide all topo necessary to define the ridgeline. 2. Existing Conditions Map - Please provide north arrow and scale. Sheet 4 1. Planned Conditions Map - Please provide north arrow and scale. Sheet 10 1. Please verify flow contributing to east channel and revise as necessary. Appears to have 3.3+3.2 cfs. 2. Please verify if a hydraulic jump occurs where east channel flattens from 20% to 1%. Sheet 12 1. Please revise northwest channel to include peak flows from southwest channel as well. 2.3+1.2 = 3.8 cfs. Sheet 13 1. Please revise northwest channel to include peak flows from southwest channel as well. 2.3+1.2 = 3.8 cfs. Sheet 14 1. Collector channels are typically designed to include additional depth to account for losses that occur across the entire length of intercepting flow. Please consider or explain why not necessary. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP20-157 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/06/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNTIL THE GRADING PLAN IS APPROVED BY ENGINEERING ZONING CANNOT APPROVE |
| 04/07/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 7, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP19-0157 DESCRIPTION: SITE / GRADING - 1967 W. Mollohan Drive, SFR. FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. Sharon Beasley Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...") |