Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0152
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/01/2019 | MASHFOR1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Last page notes Fire Service for Fire Sprinklers. Reminder: Please provide deferred submittal to TFD for Fire Sprinklers/Alarm. |
| 07/16/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2395.94') is less than 12" below the first floor elevations (2396.35', 2396.50', and 2396.80'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Note also that floors discharging from above 2396.94' shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/17/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that there are no expiration requirements on MDR approval. If applicable, indicate compliance with any additional conditions of the IID. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/18/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 07/18/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Lewis Hotel Lofts - Multi-use development / Multi-family and Retail Development Package (1st Review) - Related MDR-13-01/T13SA00082 DP19-0152 - OCR-2 Zoning / 140 E. Broadway Boulevard TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 16, 2019 DUE DATE: July 22, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 17, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section ***Address the comments listed under each standard. The standard has been left in its entirety as reference for the zoning reviewer and applicant. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 1. COMMENT: Add the north arrow and scale to sheet 5. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0152, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 3. COMMENT: Label 6th Avenue and Arizona Avenue the abutting street on the location map. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: The proposed development is within the Downtown Core - IID and is subject to review for compliance with the IID requirements. All modifications proposed must be approved prior to final approval of the DP. It is acknowledged that an MDR was approved in 2013 based on the proposed development and uses at that time. While there does not appear to be an expiration date for the MDR it does run with the use(s) for which it was approved. In the 2013 MDR, the development was for a Multiple Use building which included retail and office uses on the lower level and the upper levels were to be developed with apartments/condominiums or hospitality (Travelers Accommodation) uses. Per the submitted DP, the proposed uses listed are multifamily and retail uses only. Also, the height of the building is an additional 11'-6" taller than listed in the previous MDR, the design of the building does not appear to be the same as originally proposed, and includes a connection with the building to east which was not in the previous MDR submittal. While the uses are consistent with the previous MDR, the new proposal including modifications, and the new design, should be reviewed and reapproved through IID review and approval process prior to the approval of The DP. Once an approval of the IID has been made, list the new IID case number (if applicable) in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, and list as a general note the IID case number, modifications requested and approved, and any conditions of the approval. Assure that the DP and proposed plans that are submitted for IID review are consistent. ***Under the DCS overlay there are exemptions to multiple standards unless the PDSD Director makes a finding that the public safety and health would be jeopardized. The required standards will be evaluated on the next submittal based on the Directors findings. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 6. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 7. COMMENT: At this time it is not verified if the connection with the adjacent building to the east will affect how the calculations are to be addressed. Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming on this standard on the next review of the DP. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 8. COMMENT: Clarify if there is to be a Parcel combo due to the proposed connection between the new building and the existing building to the east. (Consult with the PDSD Structural Building and the Fire Department Plans Reviewers for possible fire code related requirements.) Clarify if there is any intent to incorporate the current uses in the east building with the new buildings uses? 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 9. COMMENT: If there is no intent to combine the two parcels, a cross access agreement or easement may or will be required. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 10. COMMENT: If the parcels are combined revise the site boundary distance bearings. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 11. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 12. COMMENT: Label the ADA route that connects to the street sidewalks. 13. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review of the DP If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP19-0152 / 1st subm. for review / Lewis Hotel Lofts is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Please submit floor plans for residential units if they are to be addressed as part of this submittal. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 07/22/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0152 1) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8-01.8.0 2) Provide a trash enclosure detail to meet TSM section 8 or otherwise show how trash service will be provided John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 07/22/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide waste stream calculations to show this project will meet the requirements of both City Code 15-10.1.E and Technical Standard 8-01.8. Show the calculations within the notes on the plan sheet. 2. Demonstrate how the existing buildings will be serviced for solid waste collection. 3. Show the solid waste and recycling containers storage location and service location on the plans. 4. Street view photos don't show the storm drain inlets along Arizona Avenue as shown on the plan. Confirm the location of the depicted storm drain inlets and show how they are connected to the City storm drain system. 5. Add a note that work near the streetcar tracks may require a track access permit. 6. The drainage statement indicates water harvesting will be incorporated into landscaped areas and planters. Show how this will be implemented. |
| 07/26/2019 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance.The project's location will have no impact to any ADOT facilities. Thank you. Tom Martinez TMartinez@Azdot.gov |
| 07/30/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - The reviews have been completed - A resubmittal is required Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0152 Description: SITE / IID - Lewis Hotel Lofts, 5-story residential and commercial. Project Manager: Alexandra.Hines@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-6975 The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for the payment. To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 07/30/2019 | NROSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This application is going through the IID design approval process |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |