Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0146
Parcel: 20564068D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0146
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/17/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/17/2019 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
06/17/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
06/17/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
06/17/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
06/25/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/26/2019 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please indicate on plans location(s) of proposed and/or existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. The furthest potion of the building cannot exceed 400' from a hydrant, or 600' from a sprinklered building.
Be advised, when the occupant load for an A-3 occupancy exceeds 300, fire sprinklers will be required.
07/12/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Oasis Church at Rita Ranch - Civic Use Group / Religious Services Use
Development Package (1st Review) - 9021 S. Atterbury Wash Way
DP19-0146 - MH-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 12, 2019
DUE DATE: July 16, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 11, 2020.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

***Address the comments listed under each standard. The standard has been left in its entirety as reference for the zoning reviewer and applicant.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the Owner/Developers telephone, contact name, telephone number, and email address.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: Assure that the information such as the legal description is consistent in all title blocks of the DP sheets. Revise the as required.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0146, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

The administrative address must be listed next to the title block of all plan sheets. List the administrative address on all sheets.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

4. COMMENT: Clarify if the easement (7399/850) along the west side of the parcel is for Ingress / Egress Access. If so this area must be available for access at all times. Presently the plan depicts development within the easement that would prohibit the access. Along the south side of the parcel a curb is proposed within the easement that would also create an issue for access.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

5. COMMENT: Revise the bicycle parking requirements according to UDC Table 7.4.8-1 Religious Use requirements as follows:
Short Term = Spaces for 2% of the maximum expected daily attendance. Maximum requirement is 50 spaces.
Long Term = 1 space per 20 employees. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

6. COMMENT: A pedestrian connection (Sidewalk) is required from the building to the Atterbury Wash Way street sidewalk. The minimum width is four feet and shall be an accessible route. Demonstrate compliance.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/12/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning Comments
07/12/2019 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
07/16/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS

When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.
A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zoned property.

The landscape plan shall include the following:

Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Additional comments may apply

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
07/16/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Note that the "Atturbury Wash North Fork Greenway" as shown on the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan may cut through the northern edge of this property north of the "FEMA line" shown on the Development Plan. This may require property acquisition or the negotiation of a trail easement at some time in the future, but no action is needed at this time.
Parks and Recreation recommends approval.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
07/16/2019 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The site is within the Atterbury Wash watershed which is a balanced basin. Provide detention calculations and design showing no increase in discharge for the 2-, 10- and 100-year events.
2. Provide 5-year threshold retention for the site.
3. Revise note 26 on sheet 1 to make sense.
4. Revise not 25 on sheet 1 to allow water-harvesting areas to be depressed up to 9 inches.
5. Revise paving and grading note 1 to reference the Pima Association of Governments Standard Detail and Standard Specification. Revise all references to the Standard Details and Standard Specifications.
6. Check to confirm the contact information in paving and grading note 16. Provide the correct numbers.
7. Use of more than two APCs will require a TSMR.
8. Sheet 2 appears to show vertical curb blocking the existing dirt road easement east of the proposed driveway. Clearly show how the easement rights will be maintained.
9. The plans show a wall proposed within the easement along the west property boundary. Show how easement rights will be maintained.
10. Show solid waste service location that doesn't interfere with the accessible parking space access.
11. The landscape buffer table on sheet 1 is not consistent with the landscape plans. Please reconcile the information.
12. Clearly show how water harvesting is maximized by directing discharge to landscape areas.
07/16/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change 1. Provide the C15-88-03 annexation ordinance and conditions in the resubmittal. Apply applicable conditions to the proposal. The C15-88-03 is not available on PRO, so the ordinance and conditions may be available in PDSD microfische (available for research M-F 8-2) or Clerk's records.

Alexandra Hines
07/17/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for your payment.
Activity/Permit Number: DP19-0146
Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Oasis Church at Rita Ranch.
Project Manager: Mallory.Ress@TucsonAz.gov

For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set.
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
Upon resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/17/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed