Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0132
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/06/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/06/2019 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The "attached PDF" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section) DP19-0132 / Rincon Country / 1st submittal for review is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 06/18/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0132 1) Include all standard applicable notes found in the City of Tucson (COT) Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06, including but not limited to the hold harmless note in AM 2-06.4.7 2) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8-01.8.0 and indicate how service will be provided John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 06/18/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/25/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Include the case # DP19-0132 on each sheet. Include all standard applicable notes found in the City of Tucson (COT) Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments are addressed. |
| 07/01/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/01/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section Project: DP19-0132 - Rincon Country West RV Resort - Classroom Addition Development Package - (1st Review) 4555 S. Mission Road - RV Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 1, 2019 DUE DATE: June 26, 2019 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 1. A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designed. 2. A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein. 3. Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule or as determined on an hourly rate. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: All drawings shall be drawn at an engineering scale. STANDARD: All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2 COMMENT: The title block and information in the title block shall be consistent on all sheets. Standard: A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 3 COMMENT: The location map shall be drawn at a scale of 3" = 1 Mile. (The location map on sheet C-1 can be used on the cover sheet and would address the standards for a location map as noted in comments 6 and 7.) STANDARD: A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. This map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information; The location map shall be drawn at 3" equal to one mile. 4 COMMENT: Include on the location map the information as noted by the standard below. STANDARD: Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. Identify major streets within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Section, township, and range, north arrow, and the scale will be labeled. 5 COMMENT: The cover sheet shall include an overall sheet index. The index shall be listed with the sheet number. The index can include the sheet name such as 1 - G1.0, 2 - X1.0 etc. revise the index as required. STANDARD: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the information for the "owner/developer" as noted by the standard below. STANDARD: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2 COMMENT: Include in the title block of all plan sheets the information listed in the standard below. STANDARD: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 1 COMMENT: Identify the use of the building. If this is a recreation building for the residents of the RV community, list it as an accessory use such as "Recreation Building". STANDARD: Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Existing Site Conditions: Information on Proposed Development: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. Design Criteria, of the UDC. 1 COMMENT: Label within the building footprint the Height and Square footage. Also rename the building to a recreation room. STANDARD: Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 07/02/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Activity Number: DP19-0132 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - Rincon Country West RV Resort, classroom addition. For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (states how all comments were addressed) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |