Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0130
Parcel: 130144420

Address:
4005 E JUAREZ ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0130
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/31/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/04/2019 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
06/12/2019 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The "attached PDF" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

DP19-0130 / Carmax / 1st submittal for review is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
06/24/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
06/28/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Upon resubmittal submit compiled plan set and removal of unnecessary documents.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
07/01/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0130

1) Sheet C3.0. The required short side stem length for the site visibility triangle is 20' not 15' which is shown. Reference City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 10-01.5.0. Update as needed. Provide site visibility triangles at both the shared access drive and the drive to the east. The long side of the SVT's are based on section 10-01.5.3
2) Sheet C3.0. The parking area adjacent to the accessible parking spaces. Show that with a vehicle overhang of 2.5' a minimum 4' wide sidewalk is maintained
3) Per TSM section 10-01.3.2.C, At the intersections of streets with other streets or collector or arterial streets with PAALs/Driveways, the curb lines will be connected with a curve having the minimum radius shown in Figure 6. The radius for the eastern driveway connection to 22nd st should be 25'. Update as needed
4) Sheet C3.0. Per City of Tucson Transportation Department Access Management Guidelines, Figure 5-4, the minimum spacing between to ingress/egress drives is 80'. The position of the eastern most drive way is less than 80' away from an adjacent drive. Update as needed
5) Sheet C3.0. Minimum driveway width for eastern most driveway is 24' per Access Management Guidelines figure 5-10
6) Sheet C10.0. Basin side slopes are shown to be 3:1. Whereas on the plan sheets basin side slopes are shown to be 4:1. Update as needed.
7) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference TSM 7-01.4.1.E
8) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each of the proposed detention basins. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future
9) Verify that the drawdown time for the proposed basins is less than 12 hours
10) Update ground cover, in water harvesting/retention areas, to be something other than Decomposed Granite. DG silts and reduces water infiltration. Decorative Screened rock or Organic Mulch is suggested
11) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8-01.8.0
12) Provide a trash enclosure detail to meet TSM section 8

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
07/02/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
NOTE - We will be closed Thursday, July 4. We will reopen July 5 except for the following.
Mechanical and Plumbing: Not available July 3, 4, and 5. Residential & Commercial Building: Not available July 4 and 5.

The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for the payment.
Activity Number: DP19-0130
Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP/FUP - Carmax Superstore #6170.
For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set.
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (listing how all comments were addressed)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The Project Manager can be contacted at: Nicholas.Ross@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4029.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
07/02/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
07/02/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Carmax Auto Superstore - Retail / Auto Rental and Sales Use
Development Package (1st Review) - 4030 E. 22nd Street
DP19-0130 - C-2 / R-3 zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 2, 2019
DUE DATE: June 28, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 24, 2020.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: Include the page number in the sheet index, i.e. 1 - C-1.0, 2 - C1.1 etc.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. COMMENT: List the Telephone and email address for the owner and list the email address for the Architect/Site Planner.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

4. COMMENT: Include in the brief legal description the "A portion of the "NW Qtr, NW Qtr of Section 22".


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5. COMMENT: List the page number in the lower right corner of plan sheets; 1 of 20, 2 of 20 3 of 20 etc.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0130, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

7. COMMENT: Label the Columbus Boulevard and 29th Street on the location map. (Section 22 is the only section that needs to be shown for the location map.)


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.
2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

8. COMMENT: There appears to be a small portion of R-3 Zoning in the southern middle portion of the site. Revise the zoning note to state existing zoning is C-2 / R-3. Also clearly delineate the zoning boundary on the site sheet.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

9. COMMENT: Revise the Use note as Follows: Vehicle Rental and Sales Use / Accessory use Service and Repair, Subject to UDC 4.9.9.G.1 & .2.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

10. COMMENT: Include a general note that states that this project has been designed to comply with UDC Section 5.7 ERZ regulations. (It is acknowledged that there is not development or disturbance within 100 feet of the wash.)


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

11. COMMENT: The site is made up of 6 individual parcels. Prior to approval of the DP a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo will have to be completed.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

12. COMMENT: The vacation of any easements must be completed prior to approval of the DP. Include in the next submittal or prior to the final submittal of the DP, any recorded documentation related to the vacation of the easements.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. COMMENT: Add a dimension from the back of curb to property line along 22nd street.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

14. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the subject site, including across the street or alleys.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

15. COMMENT: Include or revise the parking information (calculation) on the cover sheet based on the following UDC requirements, required and provided:
1 space per 400 sq. ft. GFA of show room, retail, and office area, plus 1 space per 10,000 sq. ft. of gross lot area, plus 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA of Automotive and Vehicle Repair use. Clearly distinguish the square footages based on the above areas.

Based on the following: 4947 / 400 SF for the Sales/Administration and Presentation Building, 12.36 spaces are required,
2643 / 300 SF for the Service Building, 8.81 spaces are required,
238,580 / 10,000 sf for the Lot Area, 23.85 spaces are required, the total number of spaces required is 45 and 63 were provided. 3 ADA spaces required which includes 1 van accessible space has been provided.

The additional spaces are for display and shall not be counted as required parking.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

16. COMMENT: Two short and two2 long term bicycle parking facilities are required for this development. Add a bicycle parking calculation and draw and label the location for long term facilities. Include fully dimensioned detail drawings of the proposed long term facility.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

17. COMMENT: Label the proposed height of the building within the building footprint. Remove the word "1-Story".


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

18. COMMENT: Dimension the sidewalk area between the parking spaces and the ornamental fence. If the sidewalk is not 6.5 feet in width wheel stops will be required for this row of vehicle parking spaces. label the width of the sidewalk area between the parking spaces and the west side of the sales building.

Clarify what the presentation building is going to be used for? Is it for customer pick-up, viewing? Is the area labeled as entrance for vehicles or for the customers? Is the sidewalk elevated at this location?

Add a key note stating that the cross slopes for all sidewalks is 2% max.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

19. COMMENT: Add a general note that states that all signage will be permitted under separate sign permits.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/02/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed