Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0116
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/10/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 05/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 05/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 05/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 05/14/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/31/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/03/2019 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation, (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/10/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 5.4.2. APPLICABILITY The MS&R standards apply to the following uses on property, any portion of which abuts or is adjacent to a street designated on the City's or County's MS&R Plan: A. New structures; B. Changes of use, including new structures occurring on vacant land; C. Uses of land or structures legally existing as of June 27, 1988, that are expanded in floor area, lot coverage, parking, seating capacity, or any other expansion of use, as listed below. Exception. An expansion of off-street parking for a nonconforming existing use that increases the number of spaces to the minimum required by the UDC for that use is exempt from counting toward the 25% expansion: (See Figure 5.4-A.) If the expansion is less than 25%, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion. The remainder of the use or structure shall be governed by provisions in force at the time of initial approval for the use or structure; 2. If the expansion is 25% or more, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion and to the parking and landscaping standards that apply to the overall development; or, 3. Expansions that occur after the effective date of the MS&R shall be cumulated in determining the 25% expansion. Provide expansion calculations. If applicable: Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements for the entire site by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/11/2019 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 06/11/2019 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Wienerschnitzel Parking Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP19-0116 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2019 DUE DATE: June 10, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 09, 2019. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP19-0116 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.4 - Remove the subdivision case numbers from the location map as they are not required for a DP. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide the rezoning case number, C9-18-09, the lower right corner of each sheet adjacent to the title block. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a vehicle use are expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide location dimensions for the existing curb and sidewalk along Broadway Blvd. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning for the parcels south of Broadway Blvd. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Fully dimension the existing accessible vehicle parking spaces. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The location of the wheel stop shown on the southern most accessible parking space needs to be addressed to meet UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 as the current location allows a parking vehicle to overhang a 4' sidewalk. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Based on two (2) racks the number provided should be four (4) 11. 2-06.4.9.J - It does not appear that the existing curb and sidewalk along Broadway are at the future location, see comment 6. Show the future curb and sidewalk on the plan and provide dimensions. 12. 2-06.4.9.O - The south street perimeter yard setback listed under General Note 16 and shown on sheet 3 is not correct. Based on UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback when a site has street frontage on a street designated on the MS&R plan the street perimeter yard is based on Developing Area Setbacks. That said the street perimeter yard setback should be listed as 21' or the Height of the exterior building wall, greater of the two, measured from the back of future curb. Show the future curb on the plan, see comment 11, and provide a dimension from the building to the back of future curb. The following comments are based on TSM Section 7-01.2.B. 13. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a sidewalk from the existing building to the sidewalk located within the right-of-way. This sidewalk must meet the requirements of 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009 14. 2-06.4.9.R - The will stop shown on the southern most accessible vehicle parking space must be relocated to meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 to maintain the required minimum 4' sidewalk width, see TSM 7-01.4.3.A. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from overhanging the 6.4' sidewalk shown just north of the accessible vehicle parking spaces to maintain the required minimum 4' sidewalk width, see TSM 7-01.4.3.A. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk shown at the southeast corner of the building. 17. 2-06.4.9.U - It does not appear that all the rezoning conditions are provide on the plan. Conditions 10, 11 & 12 shown in the final report are not on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/11/2019 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 06/12/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0116 1) Northern most parking spaces on the east side appear to not provide the required 2.5' vehicle overhang past the curb before hitting the site wall. Provide wheel stops as needed 2) Engineering can conduct an "over the counter" electronic review once the above comment has been addressed and a new work flow opened. Please email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 06/12/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Activity Number: DP19-0116 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - Wienerschnitzel, expansion of parking lot to the north of the parcel. For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and which reviewer comments you are responding to) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 06/18/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | No TDOT requirements |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |