Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0112
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/10/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Provide the deferred submittal for the Commercial Kitchen Hood appliance to TFD for review. This will need to be supplied as a note on the hard set plans as well for approval. |
| 05/24/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/05/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data List case number DP19-0112 in lower right corner of each sheet. The following information must be provided on the plans. Planting Plan Vegetation Plan and Schedules Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material to be removed or preserve in place. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 06/06/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section Project: DP19-00112 - McDonalds Restaurant / Construct Double Drive Through Order Lanes Development Package Review (1st Review) Related to Historic Plan H000001184 in PRO 3105 E Valencia Road - C-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 5, 2019 DUE DATE: June 5, 2019 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 1 A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designed. 2 A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein. 3 Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule or as determined on an hourly rate. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: Unless Planning to obtain an over the counter review and approval please remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff. 2 COMMENT: List the sheet numbers in the title block of all sheets, i.e. 1 of 6 2 of 6 etc. Standard: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: List the DP case number DP19-0112 next to the title block of all sheets. Standard: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Information on Proposed Development: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1 COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications across Country Club Road and Valencia Road. Standard: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 2 COMMENT: In order to use the shopping center calculation for this development there must be 50% store (Retail Trade Use Group Definition of a Shopping center) uses on the site. This development includes a Financial Use and Food Service Use both are in the Commercial Services Use Group. The parking must be provided per the individual use. Clarify if there is a cross parking agreement in place between the two developments. It appears that there are plenty of additional parking spaces that could be used by the restaurant patrons if there is a cross parking agreement. Standard: Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 1 COMMENT: Draw and label the location of the existing short and long term bicycle parking facilities. Standard: Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 2 COMMENT: Label the width of the existing sidewalk between the building and the adjacent parking spaces. The proposed crosswalk/walkway from the McDonald's sidewalk connecting to the bank Sidewalk is not acceptable. The walkway cannot be within the PAAL system unless crossing perpendicular to the PAAL. In my opinion it would be best to request a modification (TSMR) to provide the pedestrian onsite connection via the Valencia Sidewalk system. Currently a pedestrian sidewalk is located from the Restaurant out to Valencia Road and a sidewalk from the Bank out to Valencia Road. The modification can be requested due to constraints within the existing development that makes any type of connection either unsafe or not viable. (However, access ramps may have to be constructed (for accessibility) if they are not already constructed. Standard: Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 3 COMMENT: If it is decided to request a TSMR to modify the onsite pedestrian connection using the Valencia Road sidewalk, label the slopes of the existing street sidewalk. Standard: Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 4 COMMENT: With the changes proposed to the drive-through area add a general note that all new signage will be under separate permit. Standard: Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 5 COMMENT: The following link https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/permitdetail/H000001184/14029008B ) will take you to the approved site plan for the overall development from 1995. Take a look at the plans for reference. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 06/06/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 06/07/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0112 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - McDonalds USA, LLC, commercial restaurant. For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and which reviewer comments you are responding to) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle.The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 06/07/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0112 1) Show that with a 2.5' vehicle overhang the sidewalk in front of the parking area is a minimum 4' wide. Currently it appears that with a 2.5' vehicle overhang only a 3' wide sidewalk is provided. Provide wheel stops and update as needed 2) TSM section 7-01.4.2 requires physical separation of a pedestrian pathway and a vehicle travel lane. The pedestrian circulation path connecting to the east, where it turns to run north, needs to be physically separated from the vehicle travel lane. Update as needed 3) The pedestrian circulation path connecting to the east, where it turns to run north reduces the vehicle access lane to about 18'. UDC table 7.4.6-2 required a 20' minimum width access lane. Update as needed 4) Sheet SP-1, next to the existing trash enclosure 1 references Detail 1 on sheet SP-2. There is no sheet SP-2. Update as needed 5) Sheet SD-1. Van Accessible Signage. The minimum clear height from the lowest sign to grade should be 84". Per City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.3 1) There appears to be an opportunity for water harvesting in the northwest landscape area. Flow lines from the drive thru indicate a potential curb cut. Compliance with City of Tucson (COT) Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C. Available landscape area should be depressed up to 6" to maximize water harvesting 6) Remove the "DEVELOPMENT PACAKAGE PDSD APPROVAL" stamp from all sheets and reserve the space for a digital stamp to be place by PDSD upon approval John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |