Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP19-0109
Parcel: 10605009P

Address:
635 W ROGER RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0109
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/07/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/10/2019 MASHFOR1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
05/21/2019 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
05/24/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/04/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
List case number DP19-0109 in lower right corner of each sheet.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
06/06/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
06/06/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
Fee Balance: $577.50 (see the Balance column in the image below).
Prior to the completion of the next review, we require payment of the total fees (or the Review fees at a minimum). You may pay in person at the City of Tucson permit counter or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (see address below). Please write your Activity Number on the check stub.
Activity Number: DP19-0109
Project Description: SITE - Humane Society of Southern AZ, New Beginnings, canine training yard, holding kennels, fencing, gates, irrigation. For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and which reviewer comments you are responding to)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
06/06/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change From: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

Project: DP19-0109
Development Package - Animal Service Use Dog recreation and leash area expansion Phase II
635 W. Roger Road - I-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 6, 2019

DUE DATE: June 5, 2019

***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed.

CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES
Purpose
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability

This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff.

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.


The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

1 - A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designed.

2 - A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein.

3 - Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule or as determined on an hourly rate.



Per my conversation with Steve Shields Review Section Manager, this plan as submitted was acceptable for review due to the minimal changes that are proposed and was approved as a Phase II on DP16-0150. Address the following comments and resubmit for review.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1 COMMENT: List the owner/developer of the site as noted by the standard below.

Standard: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.


2 COMMENT: List the DP case number DP19-0109 next to the title block of all sheets.

List the sheet number in the title block i.e., 1 of 2 2 of 2.

List as reference next to the title block of both sheets the following DP case number DP16-0150 and DP17-0228.

Standard: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


Existing Site Conditions:

Information on Proposed Development:
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

1 COMMENT: Replace the overall site plan drawing on the cover sheet with a legible drawing. The one on the included on the plan is blurry and not very legible. The original plan sheet can be submitted as reference.

Standard: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.


Design Criteria, of the UDC.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/06/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed