Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0097
Parcel: 132130670

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0097
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/24/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/24/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
05/24/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
05/24/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
06/04/2019 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
06/07/2019 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved (The "TEP facilities map" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

WR# 6274837 June 7, 2019
City of Tucson
Attn: Sharon Beasley
Planning and Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
Dear Ms. Beasley:
SUBJECT: The Bridges, Block 2, Central Park, DP19-0097
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 29, 2019. It appears that there are no conflicts since there are no existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 917-8787.
Sincerely,
Linda Metzer, Office Support Assistant, Design/Build
cc: M. Rodriguez, Tucson Electric Power
06/12/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/13/2019 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The "attached PDF" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

DP19-0097 / 1st submittal for review / Bridges, Block 2 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
06/18/2019 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
06/21/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change (The Avigation Easement form mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

June 21, 2019
Sharon Beasley
Permit Technician
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: DP19-0097 The Bridges, Block 2, Central Park, portions of section 25 and section 30, Recreational park development / 1st Submittal, Received May 24, 2019
Dear Ms. Beasley,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP19-0097, The Bridges, Block 2, Central Park, portions of section 25 and section 30, Recreational park development; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 7.4 acre site, located southwest of the intersection of East 36th Street and M L King Jr Way. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15), with the proposed development being a recreational park.
This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, and FAA traffic pattern airspace.
The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal of this project.
Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following note into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 3 ½ miles north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport.
The proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note help to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4).
1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."
The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.
Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner
06/24/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD 15 document

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

Note: 5.11 Conflicts with Utilities and Solar Access

Trees and shrubs must be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements or with solar access, as defined in Section 11.4.20 of the Unified Development Code, to an adjacent property.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
06/25/2019 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Reqs Change The Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed the development plans and has no comments or concerns regarding the development's trail connections or it's impact on the City's park system. However, there are internal agreements between the property owner and the Tucson Parks and Recreation Department requiring park improvements to be designed and constructed to Tucson Parks and Recreation standards, and some of these standards have not been met. Parks and Recreation staff will work directly with the property owner to remedy these issues.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
06/25/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
06/28/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0097

1) Include all standard applicable notes found in the City of Tucson (COT) Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06, including but not limited to the hold harmless note in AM 2-06.4.7
2) Please remove from the plans sheets E-0 thru E-6, these are electrical plan sheets and will need to be submitted and reviewed under a separate building permit
3) Figure 29 of the bridges Planned Area Development shows a 10' wide asphalt path on the west and east sides. The proposed plan shows an 8' wide path. Update path width as needed
4) Sheet C-2. There are several grade "???" FG call outs. Update as needed
5) Sheets C-1 thru C-4 included a stamped set of plans by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer on next submittal
6) Grading plan, update sheet numbering on bottom right hand corner. Should be sequential according to the index on sheet 1
7) Grading plan sheets. Please change the line thickness and color of the 100 year floodplain limits so that it is more discernible
8) Based on the following sections of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design expand the supplied drainage statement to include
a. Section 10. Capacity calculations for the proposed 3-60"x24" CMP, shown on sheet C-2
b. Section 9. Supporting calculations for the size of riprap being used as erosion protection,
c. Section 6. Scour calculations for the toe downs shown in section A on sheet C-2
d. Section 6. Embankment scour calculations for the proposed arch bridge crossing shown on sheet C-4
e. Section 11. Capacity calculations for the propose arch bridge crossing shown on sheet C-4
9) The following are Pima County Regional Flood Control District Comments
10) Submit the Facility Impact Permit application to Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov. The District requests a hold on the pre-construction meeting until the issuance of the permit.
11) Please revise the drainage letter to include:
a. A statement that the park improvements will not affect the detention volume or function or the existing drainage infrastructure of the Mission View Wash Detention Basin.
b. A discussion of whether grading is needed to correct rill erosion, and amend the plan if appropriate.
c. A statement that all park improvements will be non-floatable or anchored and that electrical facilities are protected from flowage and ponding. Describe how the moveable tables and chairs will be non-floatable. Or add suitable notes to the plan sheets.
d. Revise the discussion of maintenance to state that the Regional Flood Control District will inspect and maintain the regional basin facilities to ensure the flood control functions of the MVWDB basin. Park facilities will be maintained by the operator of the Central Park, and the District is not responsible for maintenance or repair of park improvements. The Park operator will inspect and maintain the park facilities after storm events and remove any obstructions and repair any damage to existing basin drainage infrastructure.
12) Show more grading contours at the perimeters of the parks to show matching to existing grade.
13) On the aerial photo there is an inlet in the UA Tech Park Channel bottom near the first existing storm drain outlet. Please review and include on the plan as appropriate.
14) Show grading from the Tech Park Channel bottom to and from the proposed culvert shown on Sheet C-1.
15) Add signage to the lower park areas. Suggested language can be less alarming than roadway signage. Suggested language: "This area collects stormwater during heavy rainfalls. Use the upper park areas during stormy weather." Provide a proposed sign graphic for District review and show sign locations on the plan. Signs shall be installed prior to public admission to the park.
16) It appears that there should be some type of railing adjacent to the dog park where ponding areas may be up to 5 feet deep. Review and provide a detail and location on the plan if appropriate.

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
07/01/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
07/01/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: The Bridges - Block 2 - Central Park
Development Package (1st Review)
DP19-0097 - PAD 15 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 1, 2019
DUE DATE: June 24, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 18, 2020.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: The title block in the lower right corner of the cover sheet must be provided on each sheet in the same location.

It does not appear that all the minimum FOS Amenities for the central park have been listed on the cover sheet. Revise the list on the cover sheet to include all required amenities.

Include on a separate sheet the tracking table that includes all current developments within the PAD.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: Remove from the DP Package all sheets related to electrical, Sheets E-0 through E-6.

Revise the sheet index on the cover sheet to list the DP package sheets (29 sheets total). Also include the sheet number of the sheet in the index, 1 - L-1, 2 - L-2 etc.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. COMMENT: List the Owner/Developers' Email Address and contact person.

List the Civil Engineers' email address and contact name. Clarify if the Grading plans are to be sealed by the Marum and Associates Engineer?


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

4. COMMENT: Revise the sheet numbers listed next to the title block of all sheets to state the total number of sheet is 29.

Include the sheet numbers in the title block of sheets C-0 through C-4.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0097, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

6. COMMENT: Provide the map of the PAD area as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.
2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

7. COMMENT: List as reference the rezoning case number C9-06-32 next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

8. COMMENT: Label the site boundary information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

9. COMMENT: If applicable to the proposed area of development, draw and label all easements.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

10. COMMENT: Label the adjacent zoning classifications on the Cover sheet or on the individual site plan sheets. The zoning is PAD 15 adjacent to the subject development site in all directions.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: Indicate on the plans where the vehicle parking areas for the park are proposed? Provide the information as noted by the 2 standards above.


2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

12. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

13. COMMENT: Are there any bicycle parking facilities proposed? If so indicate on the plans the location and types as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

14. COMMENT: List the SF and hgt of the Ramada in the legend on sheet 5.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/02/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
Fee Balance: $4,049.97 (see the Balance column in the image below).
Prior to the completion of the next review, we require payment of the total fees (or the Review fees at a minimum). You may pay in person at the City of Tucson permit counter (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM) or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (see address below). Please write your Activity Number on the check.
Activity Number: DP19-0097
Project Description: SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - The Bridges, Block 2, Central Park, portions of section 25 and section 30. Recreational park development.
For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set.
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (states how all comments were addressed)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
07/02/2019 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved From: Tom Martinez <tmartinez@azdot.gov>
Date: 07/02/2019 5:23 AM
Subject: DP19--0097, Bridges Block 2, Central Park

Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance.
The project will have no impacts to nearby ADOT facilities, I-10. Thank you.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/02/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed