Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/30/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/30/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section Project: DP19-0094 - Condominium Complex / Multifamily Development Solar Review for Parking Lot Canopies - Related to T19CM03173, T19CM03175, T19CM03176, 2475 N. Haskell Drive - O-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2019 DUE DATE: June 4, 2019 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 1 COMMENT: A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: The following zoning comments are specific to the requirements for a DP only. If additional sheets are required in order to demonstrate compliance, include the sheets with the necessary information. 2 COMMENT: As noted below, the drawing must be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to an inch. The drawing submitted is labeled as not drawn to scale. Revise the drawing to have a scale. All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 1 COMMENT: A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. This map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information; The location map shall be drawn at 3" equal to one mile and shall include the following information. 2 COMMENT: Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. Identify major streets within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Section, township, and range, north arrow, and the scale will be labeled. 3 COMMENT: The north arrow, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 4 COMMENT: If additional sheets are added to the plan set include an index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1 COMMENT: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2 COMMENT: A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 3 COMMENT: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 1 COMMENT: "Existing zoning is O-3." 2 COMMENT: List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 3 COMMENT: Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Existing Site Conditions: 1 COMMENT: Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 2 COMMENT: All existing easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 3 COMMENT: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Information on Proposed Development: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1 COMMENT: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Design Criteria, of the UDC. 1 COMMENT: The location of the proposed Solar canopies along the Valencia street frontage do not meet the minimum building setbacks of 10 in this is considered the side street or if Valencia is considered the front street the minimum setback is 20 feet or 1.5 x the hgt of the structure whichever is greater. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Prior to approval of the DP and the building plans for the parking lot solar canopies, the applicant / owner must submit a Design Development Option application (DDO) for review and approval of the proposed 2' building setback from the property line to the edge of the solar canopy. Because the property is located in an established area and abuts 2 streets (Haskell Drive and Valencia Avenue) the owner may choose which street lot line is the front lot line. The front street perimeter yard shall be labeled on the plan. Choosing the front street perimeter makes a difference in the building setback requirement as noted above. Please read the following carefully so that the correct process can be followed. a. Assuming that the east side street is selected as the front street lot line, the minimum building setback for all new structures is the greatest of 20 feet or 1.5 times the height of the structure. Based on the cross section for Canopy 1 on sheet PV-3 of the building plans permit number T19CM03176, the height of the tallest point of the canopy structure including the solar panel from grade is 15.94 feet. The required building setback is 1.5 x 15.94' = 23.91 feet from the property line to the face of the structure. Per the site plan the building setback is labeled as 20 feet. A DDO to reduce the building setback from 23.91 feet to 20 feet is required. b. If the north perimeter is chosen as the front street lot line the building setback would be 23.91 feet from the north property line to the face of the structures. A DDO to reduce the front street perimeter building setback from 23.91 feet to 2 feet is required. (In this case Haskell Dr. becomes the side street perimeter and the building setback would be a minimum 10 feet to all new structures.) c. Until the plan is labeled with the front street perimeter the DDO comments needed to apply for the modification to the building setback cannot be provided. However, choosing Haskell as your front street lot line will require approval of two building setback modifications, (under one application). If Valencia Avenue is chosen as the front street lot line all the new canopy structures along the Haskell Drive are well within the 10 foot setback requirement and no DDO is required. The DDO (as noted in section b above) would be for the reduced setbacks to the solar canopies along the Valencia Avenue frontage only. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 05/30/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0094 1) Show on plans all service vehicle maneuvering areas, for waste collection, according to City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual section 8. Show the clear operating space in front of any dumpsters 2) Show on plans any utility easements. It appears that the proposed canopy to the north is directly over a water easement. Adjust positioning of canopies as needed so that they are not located over any easements or obtain written permission from the easement holder for the construction of the canopy John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 05/30/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0094 Project Description: SITE - Catalina Towers, solar PV system canopy and on rooftop. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and which reviewer comments you are responding to) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 06/04/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION 7.7.3. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section apply to all development as listed below. A. New Development All new development proposed in the City of Tucson shall comply with the standards of this section. Submit NPP plan or application for exception. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/04/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |