Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP19-0088
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/16/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Where a potable public water supply is not available, the use of a private source of potable water (e.g. well, spring, stream, or cistern) is possible but the interconnection of a private water supply and a potable public water supply is prohibited. There is a 12" main water transmission line located within 30-feet of the east property line and a second 1" water service located in the right-of-way due east of the proposed modular building. What is the source of water for the 2500-gallon tank? Reference: Sections 602.3 and 608.7.1, IPC 2018. [Initial comment: The maximum demand flow that is allowed by Tucson Water for the existing 1" water meter is 37.5 GPM. Verify that the existing water meter is adequate for the addition of the demand from the new building.] 2. Connection to the existing public sewer system is required; a private on-site sewage treatment system is not an option. Reference: Section 701.2, IPC 2018.[Initial comment: If the existing building sewer and water service pipes that will be located below the proposed building are not listed for use under a building or interfere with the proposed building foundation, they must be relocated. Reference: Sections 605.3, 605.4, and 702.2, IPC 2018.] |
| 07/17/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | July 16, 2019 RE: DP19-0088 Tucson Transitional / 2nd Submittal, Received June 24, 2019 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP19-0088, Tucson Transitional; 2nd Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 1.03 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of East Valencia Road and South Park Avenue. The property is zoned Commercial Zone 1 (C-1) and Commercial Zone 2 (C-2), with the proposed development being a new modular building to support an office space for counseling and rehabilitation services. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, FAA Part 77 airspace, City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone - Airport Hazard District, and City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone - Noise Control District-65. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Conditions of approval: 1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That development shall not cause or potentially affect aviation in the vicinity of the site, including but not limited to, physical obstructions to aircraft operations, interference with operations by way of electrical static, visual obstructions through emissions or glare, and/or the open storage of petroleum products, explosive materials, or materials which attract or lead to the concentration of wildlife." Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following note into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 200 feet north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. This proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300, Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc: bcainelomberto@behavioralsystemssouthwest.com |
| 07/18/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tucson Transitional Housing Program - Residential Use Group Development Package (1st Review) - Physical and Behavioral Health Use DP19-0088 - C-1 Zoning / 6420 S. Park Avenue TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 16, 2019 DUE DATE: July 23, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 10, 2020. A.M. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) __________________________________________________________________________________________ ***Address only the "Follow Up Comments" listed below. The previous comments and standards have been left for the reviewers and applicant as reference. 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 8: Remove any information related to B-2A zoning. The zoning note should state the existing zoning is C-1 and C-2. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." Previous Comment 8: Revise the zoning on sheet 2 to state "Existing Zoning is C-1 and C-2". 2. Follow up to Previous Comment 9: The information related to the use and use specific standards must be revised to reflect the correct use and standards listed in the current Unified Development Code. The LUC document has been replaced with the UDC. Refer to the UDC manual for all relevant Zoning, Technical Standards, and Administrative processes. In the UDC, the use of the site falls under the Residential Care Services / Physical and Behavioral Health use. All zoning information such as, Use Specific Standards, Dimensional Standards, Vehicle and Bicycle Parking etc. shall be revised to match what is listed in the UDC. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Previous Comment 9: List the use of the property on sheet 2. The use appears to be a Residential Use Group: Physical and Behavioral Health Use and Subject to C-1: 4.9.7.J.3.d, .4, & .8 and 4.9.13.O. Review UDC Sections listed List as a general note the following: "Existing and Proposed Use - Residential Use Group: Physical and Behavioral Health Use and Subject to C-1: 4.9.7.J.3.d, .4, & .8 and 4.9.13.O". 3. Follow up to Previous Comment 13: While the dimensional standards do not require lot coverage for this use, use specific standard 4.9.5.7.J.8 has a maximum of 60%. List the lot coverage calculation on the cover sheet under the Zoning and Land Use Notes section of the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; Previous Comment 13: This use is subject to a maximum of 60% lot coverage. Include a lot coverage calculation on sheet 2. Lot coverage includes all buildings and vehicle use area. 4. Follow up to Previous Comment 14: The building percent expansion calculation could not be verified on the plan. List the building expansion percentage calculation under the Zoning and Land Use Notes section of the cover sheet. (6,520 / 514 = 7% building expansion). 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, Previous Comment 14: Include a building expansion calculation on sheet 2. 5. Follow up to Previous Comment 18: This comment will remain until the Pima County Tax Parcel is processed and accepted by the Pima County Assessor's Office and the documents provided to PDSD. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. Previous Comment 18: This development is made of five parcels. It does not appear that the parcels have been combined into one and therefore the lot lines for each parcel (lot) must be drawn and lot numbers labeled. If the proposed building straddles the lot line the structure must be located on the parcel where no part of the building straddles any lot line. (All parcels can be combined into one tax parcel by processing a Pima County Assessor's Tax Parcel Code combination of all the parcels.) 6. Follow Up to Previous Comment 23: Remove the vehicle parking calculations related to the previous approval. Revise the calculations to the current UDC requirements listed in table 7.4.4-1. List the number of vehicle parking spaces required and number provided. The parking ratio for this use is listed under the Residential Care Services Use, 21 or more residents; 1 space per 2 beds. List the number of existing residents (and total if additional residents are proposed) under the use note and use that number to establish the number parking spaces required. The parking for the office use can remain as noted. ( List the number space required and number provided.) The number of ADA parking spaces is based on the number of the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Once the correct number is verified list the number of ADA spaces required, including van accessible spaces. The ADA parking area on sheet 2 shall be revised to match the detail drawing on sheet three and dimension the ADA parking spaces on the detail. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous Comment 23: Dimension the lengths of the Parking spaces facing the buildings. Also, dimension the distance of the wheel stop to the front of the parking space; the distance should be 2.5 feet from the front wheel stop side to the front of the parking space. Indicate on the plan the accessible parking space(s) and accessible aisle required adjacent to an accessible space. Dimension the ADA spaces and access aisle. Of the 2 ADA spaces required one must be a Van accessible space, label the ADA van space. The Parking calculation shall be revised based on the current code requirements for Residential Care use which requires parking based on the number of residents. 1 to 5 =, 6 to 10 =6. 11 to 15 = 5, 16 to 20 = 6, 21 or more = 1 space per 2 beds. The Admin office can be parked at 1 /300 SF of Office area. List the number of clients as a general note in order to verify the number of parking spaces required. 7. Follow up to Previous Comment 24: Revise the Use to residential Care Service Services for the bicycle parking calculation. The ratio for the short term facilities has been listed incorrectly. The ratio is .05 spaces per bedroom. Revise the short term calculation accordingly. The long term facility requirements are based on .5 spaces per bedroom, revise the calculation accordingly. The short and long term bicycle facilities for the office use is a minimum of 2 short and 2 long term facilities. Revise the bicycle parking calculation for the office use area accordingly. (Additional bicycle facilities above what is required can be added per the owner.) List the number required and number provided. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Previous Comment 24: This development requires both short and long term bicycle parking facilities. Revise the bicycle parking facilities calculation to show the number required and number provided for short and long term facilities. Include the dimensioned detail drawing for the short and long term facilities as noted by the standard above. 8. Follow up to Previous Comment 32: As noted in the previous comment 32, additional comments could be forthcoming. There are notes on the plans that are not applicable anymore due to the change of zoning codes. Remove all notes related to the old LUC document and revise all notes to the current zoning code, Unified Development Code (UDC. There are notes on the plans that have been unnecessarily duplicated on multiple sheets, review the sheets and remove all duplicate or triplicate notes. The cover sheet should include all relevant notes and zoning calculations listed in Administrative Manual 2-06. Notes have also been added to the plans that are relevant, such as the information listed in the lower right corner of all sheets (the information listed is from my set of comments.); remove all irrelevant notes that are not applicable to the project unless the PDSD/CDRC plans reviewers have specifically requested them to be added. Per my conversation with Gerald Shingleton on July 16, 2019, I let him know that I would redline the latest revision of the DP plans for zoning only and send him a PDF copy for his reference along with a copy of the latest zoning comments. Previous Comment 32: Additional could be forthcoming on the next submittal of the DP based on the corrections to the plans or responses to the zoning review comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/18/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/22/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The following comments were not addressed from previous review. 5.4. MAJOR STREET AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 5.4.2. APPLICABILITY The MS&R standards apply to the following uses on property, any portion of which abuts or is adjacent to a street designated on the City's or County's MS&R Plan: A. New structures; B. Changes of use, including new structures occurring on vacant land; C. Uses of land or structures legally existing as of June 27, 1988, that are expanded in floor area, lot coverage, parking, seating capacity, or any other expansion of use, as listed below. Exception. An expansion of off-street parking for a nonconforming existing use that increases the number of spaces to the minimum required by the UDC for that use is exempt from counting toward the 25% expansion: (See Figure 5.4-A.) 1. If the expansion is less than 25%, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion. The remainder of the use or structure shall be governed by provisions in force at the time of initial approval for the use or structure; 2. If the expansion is 25% or more, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion and to the parking and landscaping standards that apply to the overall development; or, 3. Expansions that occur after the effective date of the MS&R shall be cumulated in determining the 25% expansion. The building percent expansion calculation could not be verified on the plan. List the building expansion percentage calculation under the Zoning and Land Use Notes section of the cover sheet. (6,520 / 514 = 7% building expansion). Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included Provide expansion calculation. If necessary, provide the following for the entire site: Compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/23/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | It is not clear these comments were addressed on the most recent set of plans. Include a clear discussion in the response letter how each comment has been addressed. 1. Show the existing and future MS&R right-of-way including intersection widening on the plans. 2. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles. 3. The east 10 feet of the property were dedicated to right-of-way. Revise the plans to provide the correct existing dimensions. 4. Show existing interior lot lines for the site or provide a lot combination. 5. Show roof drainage patterns to demonstrate the sidewalks will be kept flood-free for up to a 10-year event. |
| 07/24/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0088 Description: SITE - Tucson Transitional Housing Program, add office space/modular office addition For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Please name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff At resubmittal, the plans will enter another 20-working-day review cycle. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |