Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0063
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | A review is not required. This agency was notified for their information only. |
| 03/20/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | CO2 Operational will be required through the TFD |
| 03/25/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | WR#6264784 March 25, 2019 City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 Dear Ms. Beasley: SUBJECT: The Station DP19-0063 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 19, 2019. It appears that the Electric service to the new business is not depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 917-8787. Sincerely, Linda Metzer Linda Metzer Office Support Assistant Design/Build lm Enc. cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Rodriguez, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/25/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Environmental & General Services Department has completed our review of the Development Package for The Station proposed to be located at 901 S. 6th Avenue in Tucson. Food service, brewery and cafe facilities are proposed for this site. The waste generation calculations on Sheet 1 of 10 were reviewed and found to be accurate. It is proposed to provide one 2 cubic yard container for refuse and one 2 cubic yard container for recycling materials. The two metal containers would be stored in one enclosure designed and constructed in accordance with Figure 3A in Section 8 : Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection and Storage of the Tucson Technical Standards Manual. The waste and recycling enclosure is proposed to be located on the east-central portion of the subject site. It appears that opening of the gates of the enclosure to the east would extend into a portion of S. Arizona Avenue. What approvals, if any, would be required for this design? Are the containers to be serviced at the enclosure location or will the containers be rolled out of the enclosure and positioned somewhere else around the property for servicing? It appears there are refuse vehicle maneuvering issues and overhead utility issues with servicing the containers at the enclosure location. Please have the applicant explain the proposed servicing procedures for this site. Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thanks. Tom Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department Thomas.Ryan@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Reqs Change | Gary will be retiring next month, all reviews should be sent to David Marhefka. Here is his review on this project. 1. Show all SVTs for all intersections in all directions 2. Please add the following note to plans. "Existing City trees and irrigation are to remain in place." 3. SVT on Arizona Avenue is blocked by Trash Enclosure. 4. Trees and plants on north side are too close the public sidewalk. 5. Tree on the west side of project will conflict with the exiting tree. If you have any questions please contact me. Thank you, David Marhefka David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/04/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | March 29, 2019 Sharon Beasley Permit Technician City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP19-0063 The Station, 1st Submittal, Received March 19, 2019 Dear Ms. Beasley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP19-0063, The Station, 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.37 acre site, located southeast of the intersection of East 19th Street and South 6th Avenue. The property is zoned Commercial 3 (C-3), with the proposed development being a food service use; a brewery and cafe. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Condition of approval: 1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the City of Tucson consider requiring the applicant to add the following note into the general notes of the revised development plans. This project is located approximately 5 ΒΌ miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through requiring the property owner to record the Avigation Easement. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner |
| 04/10/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape ArchitectTucson Parks & Recreation(520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/12/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/15/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | April 15 2019 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP19-0063 PROJECT NAME: The Station PROJECT ADDRESS: 901 S 6th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package. 1. Verify existing ramps for ADA slope requirements. Replace and show new Pedestrian ramps along 19th street/6th Av, and 19th/S Arizona Av if they do not meet current standards. 2. Minimum Driveway width along 6th Avenue is 24 feet. Use PAG standard detail for driveway. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/17/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: Board of Adjustment case; Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 5.12.9. GREATER INFILL INCENTIVE SUBDISTRICT (GIIS) Except as required by Section 5.12.8.B, Development Transition Standards, a complete or partial exception to Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, may be granted if shade is provided for pedestrians and customers, such as along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths, and outdoor patios, in accordance with Section 5.12.6.A.2. The landscaping requirement may also be waived by the PDSD Director based on a written finding that the waiver is necessary to preserve the prevailing setback. The following comment refer to the underlining zone. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Street Landscape Borders To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards: a. Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. 10' wide landscape buffer is required along 6th Ave, 19th Street, and Arizona Ave. Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way Use of the Public Right-of-Way Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; 2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and, 3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Obtain permission for use of ROW. Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Identify any screening elements on Landscape plan Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/19/2019 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | 3/20/19 - Maria Gayosso Applicant still needs to file for IID application. |
| 04/23/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: The Station - Commercial Use Group / Food Service Use Development Package (1st Review) 901 S 6th Avenue DP19-0063 - C-3 Zoning (Project Applicant Is Requesting Modifications Under the GIID Overlay) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 23, 2019 DUE DATE: April 17, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 14, 2019. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0063, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2. COMMENT: Label Cushing Street and Church Avenue on location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: Clarify if the Food Service use will include the alcohol service or a microbrewery as an accessory use? If so list the alcohol use and microbrewery as an accessory use to the Primary Food Service use. Include a note under the use note that clearly states the applicant's intention to use the IID zoning option in lieu of the existing underlying zoning. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: It is clear that this project is designed with only 3 onsite parking spaces. In total, 65 parking spaces are required for the food service use and all parking spaces must be provided on site. The project site is within the GIIS overlay district and may qualify for modifications for 25% vehicle parking modification. On street parking is not an exception listed under the GIIS section 5.12.C.2.c.1 or .2. No additional parking has been identified on the DP. I do not believe that the reduction for vehicle parking under the UDC can be used in conjunction with the IID overlay. Revise the parking calculations accordingly. Contact PDSD's Planners Maria Gayosso or Carolyn Laurie for information on the IID process and available options and exceptions to development requirements 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: If in fact the GIID overlay process is used a GIID case number will be assigned to this project. List the case number as reference next to the title block and as a general note with any modifications requested and approved as well as any conditions of the GIID application. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 6. COMMENT: Under general note five (5) the paved area is listed as 3,474 sf. It t does not appear that the onsite vehicular use area is 1,000 sf., where is the additional paved area? Offsite paving is not counted towards onsite vehicular use areas. Revise general note 5 accordingly. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: The vehicle parking area does not meet the minimum PAAL width of 24 feet. A PDMR approval would be required unless it is determined that the under the IID the Vehicular use can be modified as depicted. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: The proposed reduction to reduce the number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be used in conjunction with the GIIS overlay. Approval of the vehicle parking reduction must be approved through the GIIS review and approval process. Keep in mind that the total number of vehicle parking spaces is 65 and that the number of ADA spaces required is based on 65. 3 ADA spaces with one being a van accessible space are required for this project. Two ADA spaces are depicted on the DP and are proposed on-street. As of this review it is not clear if the ADA spaces as depicted will be approved. The number of ADA spaces cannot be waived through any UDC modification or variance. Additional comments may be forth coming on this standard. (Contact the PDSD ZA for clarification) 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 9. COMMENT: If there is any vehicle parking proposed off-site (not on the street) a detail drawing of the location and ADA pedestrian circulation path must be identified on the DP. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 10. COMMENT: It appears that the short term bicycle parking facilities are proposed within the R/W and on-site. Approval as proposed will be evaluated during the GIIS review and approval process. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 11. COMMENT: Contact TDOT for information about future right of way dedication for 6th Avenue. Include any the future right of way, labeled and dimensioned on the site plan sheets. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: Label the street setback from the building overhang to the nearest edge of travel lane along the 19th street frontage. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 13. COMMENT: Label the structure height of the patio area adjacent to the building 1. 14. COMMENT: Address all reviewer comments and DRC comments. Revise the plans accordingly and resubmit for review. Include any DRC review document with the next submittal of the DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/23/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 04/24/2019 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | Real Estate Department has no comment at this time. Michael J. Hollar SENIOR PROPERTY AGENT REAL ESTATE DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF TUCSON 201 N. Stone Ave, 6th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 Direct: 520-837-6784 Main: 520-791-4371 |
| 04/25/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 04/26/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0063 1) Provide written approval from TDOT and General Services for the placement of the proposed trash enclosure. Current placement does not provide for proper service vehicle maneuvering. Swing gates extend into Right of Way 2) Show on plans that all existing non-compliant curb access ramps, on or around the site, will be updated to PAG standard 207 and be in compliance with ICC A117 3) Show on plans all applicable site visibility triangles 4) All vehicular use areas are to be designed in compliance with City of Tucson Unified Development Code section 7.4. Current parking area areas do not meet minimum width requirements and show vehicles backing onto the E 19th St John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 04/26/2019 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal because of the location and any impacts to ADOT facilities. Regional Traffic supports its acceptance. Thank you Tom Martinez Arizona Dept. of Transportation TMartinez@Azdot.gov |
| 04/29/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0063 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - The Station, food service, new brewery and cafe. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and to which reviewer comments you are responding) 2) Corrected Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). The Project Manager can be reached via email or phone: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4927. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |