Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0056
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/06/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | This agency was notified for their information only. A review is not required. |
| 03/06/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | This agency was notified for their information only. A review is not required. |
| 03/06/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | This agency was notified for their information only. A review is not required. |
| 03/06/2019 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | This agency was notified for their information only. A review is not required. |
| 03/07/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Please make sure that all fire hydrants (water sources) are located on the plan set and fire access is identifiable. TFD will review once plans are submitted for any additional fire needs |
| 03/07/2019 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Further Design Review is required, folder will be denied until the project is complete. Please continue to include the Design Professional Folder. |
| 03/25/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | March 25, 2019 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP19-0056 PROJECT NAME: HUB IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2030 E speedway Blvd #110 PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package. 1. Provide a Category II Traffic impact analysis. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/27/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | The Addressing Review of DP19-0056 / Hub IV at Park & Speedway / 1st submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/28/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Indicate Case # DP19-0056 on sheets of Development Package. LANDSCAPING Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the following: Mail Gate District Development https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/pdfs/PlannedAreaDevelopmentAndOverlay/O11015_Main_Gate.pdf C-9 Landscaping Obtain approval by the City Engineer or designee that proposed landscape within the City of Tucson R.O.W complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/03/2019 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 04/03/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | A complete submittal with drainage and grading is required. |
| 04/03/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner Zoning Review Section PROJECT: The Hub IV, 902 E Speedway Bl Development Package (1st Review) DP19-0056 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 3, 2019 DUE DATE: March 29, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 22, 2020. 1. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 2. 2-06.4.2 - Per Main Gate Overlay B-2.a.3 the title block on all sheets must include the phrase: Development Under Main Gate District Zoning Option. 3. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided in the title block. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Case number DP19-0056 has been assigned. Correct references to #C9-12-01 in multiple locations throughout the plan set to read in the correct format. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing uses of the property as classified per the UDC. Amend permitting note 2 to read: Existing use of the property is Commercial - Food Service and Commercial - Personal Services. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the proposed use of the property as classified per the Main Gate Overlay. Amend permitting note 3 to read: Proposed use of the property is Residential - Group Dwelling, Commercial - Food Service, and Retail. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Clarify permitting note 6. The project is subject to meeting the Main Gate District Optional Urban Overlay Zone, #C9-12-01. Also include a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the overlay. 8. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide a basis of bearing for reference of property perimeter information. 9. 2-06.4.8.B - Clarify the 5' street light easement illustrated on sheet 2. It appears planters and bicycle parking are planned within the easement area. Provide documentation of approval from TDOT for use of the easement area. 10. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. As this site is bounded by a street with a width of more than 50', the existing conditions across the street must also be provided. 11. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. The newly combined lot(s) must be recorded with Pima County and documentation provided with development package submittal. 12. 2-06.4.9.E - Existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. 13. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. The two-way access lane on the lower level parking plan dimensioned at 19.17' does not meet standards. A two-way access lane standard width is 20'. The two-way PAAL dimensioned at 19.95' also does not meet standards. A two-way PAAL is required at 20' per the Main Gate Overlay section C-5.d.1. Please note, if opting into the Main Gate Overlay, standards cannot be modified in conjunction with other waivers or modification provisions of the UDC. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - For parking purposes, clarify planned square footage for the different uses proposed in the building. Permitting note 3 on sheet 1 notes planned uses as residential, commercial and retail. The provided parking calculation on sheet 1 only includes residential and retail. If a commercial use is planned, it must be included in the parking calculation. The Main Gate Overlay calculates parking based on three categories: Residential, Retail and Other Non-Residential. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clarify parking calculation on sheet 1. Clarify whether the compact spaces are part of the total number provided and what percentage of total spaces are compact spaces. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide vehicle parking space counts on the rows of parking on the plan set in order to verify total number of provided parking spaces. Upon preliminary count it does not appear the spaces provided on the plan set match the number indicated in the vehicular parking calculations. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Correct parking spaces dimensioned as 'compact' with a standard size of 7.5' x 15'. The Main Gate Overlay allows for compact parking spaces dimensioned at 7.5' x 16'. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Numerous parking spaces are located adjacent to vertical barriers, such as a wall. Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.a: A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. Spaces adjacent to walls must meet the 10' width. A new typical dimension for these spaces must be provided in the plan set. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Accessible parking spaces must provide an accessible access aisle to appropriate entrances of the building per adopted building code. Accessible spaces in the western parking area do not meet this standard. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Sufficient information on dimensions of bicycle parking facilities has not been provided. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Correct bicycle parking calculations provided on sheet 1. The retail use will require a minimum of 2 long-term bicycle parking spaces per Main Gate Overlay C-5.b.2.ii. 23. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Ensure proposed easements indicated on the plan set include this information. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 24. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines will be shown. Correct the building setbacks table on sheet 1 to indicate the range of setbacks provided. For instance, the setback provided on Speedway Bl ranges from 21.5' to 22' and along Park Av the setback provided ranges from 0.67' to 5'. 25. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 26. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. Per Main Gate Overlay C-4.b.4 and .5, Park Av requires a minimum 4' from the back of the curb to the sidewalk and an 8' sidewalk clear area. Tyndall Av requires a minimum 4' from back of curb to the sidewalk and a 5' sidewalk clear area. Proposed layout does not meet this standard. 27. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 28. Per Main Gate Overlay Table 1, open space is required at 25 sq ft per dwelling unit and 15% of the site area for non-residential uses. Correct the open space calculations on sheet 1 and clarify where the open space is being provided on site. A total of 9,635.7 sq ft of open space is required. Only 7,153 sq ft is indicated as provided, with the location being unclear. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0056 Project Description: SITE/GRADING/MGD - Hub IV at Park & Speedway, group dwelling, food service, and retail. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, name your documents accordingly - a 2nd submittal document would be titled: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which reviewer comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Prior to the completion of the next review, we require payment of the total fees (or the Review fees at a minimum). Please pay either at the permit counter or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (address is below). Include the Activity Number on your check stub. The fee balance is $1206.50 (see the Balance column in the image below). The Project Manager can be reached via email: Elisa.Hamblin@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4966. Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 04/08/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The invert and rim elevations of the proposed new public manholes. b. The points of connection to the proposed public sewer. c. Will a backwater valve be required for the building. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 04/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Environmental & General Services Department has completed our review of the Development Package for the Hub IV project located at 934 E. Speedway Boulevard. It is proposed to construct a mixed use structure containing group dwelling, food service and retail establishments. The waste generation calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. It is proposed that two 4 cubic yard containers be used to store refuse and two 4 cubic yard containers also be used to store recycle materials. The containers will be rolled out to the central public alley and be serviced five days per week. On Sheet No. C 2.0, the Site Plan sheet, Keynote No. 23 indicates "Structure Above" the staging area in the alley for the refuse and recycling containers. To provide for maneuvering of the refuse vehicle, there must be a minimum vertical clearance of 25 feet over the containers and over a 40 foot by 14 foot access area in front of the containers. Please have the applicant clarify that there is the required vertical clearance to access the containers in the public alley. Assuming the required vertical clearance is provided as discussed above, Environmental & General Services would approve the proposed solid waste management plans for the Hub IV project. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |