Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0048
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/04/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/27/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | ***See attachment in documents table on PRO*** The Addressing review of DP19-0048 La Suprema, 1st submittal is Conditionally Approved by Pima County Addressing subject to adding the Subdivision Plat Reference to the legal description. Also, please note that the Unit Numbers 1-7 will be retired from the address 319 W Simpson St. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/28/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE The Development Plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Indicate Case # DP19-0056 on all sheets of Development Package. 5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ) 5.8.9. DESIGN STANDARDS Landscaping Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/04/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide waste stream calculation. Changes to the solid waste enclosure might be required based on the results of the results of the calculation. |
| 04/08/2019 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 04/08/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/08/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: La Suprema Co-Working, 319 W Simpson St Development Package (1st Review) DP19-0048 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 8, 2019 DUE DATE: April 1, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 28, 2020. 1. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 2. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 3. 2-06.4.2 - Revise the title block to remove the term "Tenant Improvement" and replace with "Development Package". 4. 2-06.4.2.B - The title block shall include a brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 5. 2-06.4.4 - Correct the project location map to remove colors and/or rasterize properly. It is currently illegible. Also show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area and identify regional watercourses within the square mile area. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The existing use is Commercial - Food Service. The proposed use is Commercial - Administrative and Professional Office. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Adjacent to the title block, list the assigned case number (DP19-0048) along with related cases (C9-74-20) and the historic review case number when assigned. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 8. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 9. 2-06.4.8.B - Verify there are no existing or proposed easements. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. Include dimensions (length) for the accessible on-street parking space. 11. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 12. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. Verify with Transportation changes will not be required to the existing ramp at the northeast corner of the Simpson and Main intersection. 13. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/09/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0048 Project Description: SITE - La Suprema co-working tenant improvement to sidewalks, wall, sign, parking ramps and space, porch, overhang, gas stub, apron, steps. Existing vacant historic structure. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, name your documents accordingly - for example, a 2nd submittal document would be titled: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which reviewer comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). The Project Manager can be reached via email: John.VanWinkle@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-5007. Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |